I provide links because this is an indepth issue which I've written at length about and cannot be answered in a short comment. You have answered the article with the mainstream bullshit argument that he won on a technicality.
This explains what really happened - https://northerntracey213875959.wordpress.com/2021/10/28/all-about-that-measles-trial/
No he won the appeal because the original judge di exactly what you are doing now, he deferred to the 'experts' without looking at the evidence nor even understanding the fraud that they have been committing. Of course it's a good idea to take in to court because it's sets a precedent. How else do we expose lying scientists and corporations??
Here is my own writing on the issue of viruses which I've also published on Blurt but you may not have seen. https://northerntracey213875959.wordpress.com/2021/05/25/going-viral-a-recipe-for-disaster/
Oh and BTW the original reward for proof of a measles virus has been increased to 100,000 euro and yet not one 'scientist' or 'virologist' has come forward to claim the prize. If the virus existed then why can no-one prove it?
Yes, this is often the case with these kinds of issues. I have been in the same boat countless times, so I understand the conundrum of trying to present a complex topic with a few sentences.
There is always the equal risk that the precedent can go in favor of the opposition if the case is not presented well.
James Randi offered $1,000,000 to anyone who can prove homeopathy works... no one claimed the prize. The innuendo here is that homeopathy has been proven not to work.
As for the homeopathy challenge that's a tangent I'm not prepared to go down right now suffice to say it's a distraction to our original point and would be impossible to prove 'scientifically'.
I highly recommend this talk which I watched just yesterday, I think it will answer all your questions nicely in a nutshell. Let me know what you think.
https://odysee.com/@dharmabear:2/Dr-Jordan-Grant-Science-Pseudoscience-and-the-Germ-Theory-of-Disease:a
Nor would I ask you to go down that road, as I believe very much in homeopathy! 😉 You would be preaching to the choir. 😆 My point was that this is not my preferred choice of how to prove something to be true or not.
I will bookmark that link and have a listen when I can. Thanks!!!
Ok gotcha playing devils advocate. BTW I don't debate any more it's fruitless. You can lead a horse to water and all that. I just write my shit and hope some people 'get it'.
Not quite devil's advocate, but I know what you mean. 😊 It's more in line with what I wrote previously, in that I am your colleague who is attempting to disprove your theory on your behalf. I also do not like debating, as it is indeed fruitless. I remember hearing someone add something to that old saying which I really like... You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink, nor do you have the right to simply because you're thirsty.
But it's not MY theory and Stefan Lanka is doing an admirable job of making the whole of virology look like a scam all by himself. Have you seen his latest stuff? His control experiments? You won't see that in any 'science' journals for peer review.
Well for me, it was your theory 🤣 as you were the first person to present me with the idea that viruses don't exist. And my theory is that they do exists. From there, we seek support from other sources to run with that theory.
I'll be perfectly honest, the theory that viruses don't exist runs strongly counter to my desire to see justice brought to the likes of Fauci, and all those who are involved in this kind of biological manipulation and warfare. I believe viruses are real, some benign, some dangerous, some lethal. I believe viruses can be manipulated via Gain of Function, and all those involved should be held accountable. Viruses don't exist? Everyone is off the hook! Not the scenario that I want to see played out.
I wouldn't deny they have tried to manufacture viruses in labs, the problem (for them) is they have tried and failed because they are basing their research on a false paradigm. They WANT you to believe they have the technology to do that. It gives them credibility when they have none.
They didn't need a real virus to manufacture this plandemic. They only needed the BELIEF in one. Just like a religion they don't need proof only faith.
Your faith in viruses deflects all your attention away from the real cause which I and others suspect is the switching on of 5G.
Fauci et al will NOT get away with their crime if viruses are outed as non existent because in fact it would prove they have deceived us all and sold us a bogus cure for something they made up. They have made millions through the largest scam in the history of the world as we know it. They have murdered countless people with their deadly protocols (medazolam and ventilators) by covering up the real cause and are continuing to murder with bogus jabs followed by deadly treatments and diagnosis which deflect again from the cause. If there is no virus (and there isn't) they are even more guilty of fraud than you already think.
If we don't expose the foundation of the scam they can roll out pandemic after pandemic until the cows come home, until they reach their magic number of population on their Georgia Guidestones. Until they have gotten rid of 2/3 of us. Those who believe will not survive. Keep on believing and perish or open your eyes and live without fear. It's an easy choice.