We remember now, M. Jay, is defending for, what I am thinking is a racist hiding in the closet, Chandra. Or Maybe...hmm. No clue yet. But it certainly seems to me they are on the same team here. After all, this whole ordeal did start with this meme:
This was first inserted into a post that was hellbent on calling for substack users to unite and deplatform an overwhelming amount of nazis on the platform. The honest truth of that matter was that there was very little evidence to support the claim of "overwhelming amount of nazis" on the Substack platform.
So thus this small echo chambered game of Russian roulette took place amongst these "social justice warriors" and started calling out anyone who was against censoring nazis were a nazi themselves.
This is most of Chandras responses from that meme.
Here is what I am seeing:
So let's see what this other wild Pokémon that showed up is all about shall we?
Mr. M. Jay, first approached me here:
[Click here](https://substack.com/profile/181977101- m-jah/note/c-48738218?r=dbg14) to read more
My response(probably not the best one, buuut..) :
Morality IS violent whichever way it goes. Most people can not seem to grasp that.
I mock ideologs and bad actions as lne should ibstay away from their character. Whl is scared though? Seems everyone is scared.
I’m just being honest the whole way. Seems everyone wants honesty. Until your honest with them, then your just an ass hole.
Don't worry though. I'll be collecting our entire conversation i had with chandra sobyou can see the bigger picture. Maybe you can see who the real asshole here is.
Kill myself. Seriously? Do you even listen to what you say?
Lol
M. Jay replies:
if morality is violent then kill your self now but if you be honest if you kill yourself morality is pacifism.. ninjas which felt in unhonor did so.. when then morality is a sword which kills wordly.. totally nonviolent.. what kills it? lies of a dumb man talking..
how you call one of those which just read the half..and from the half the half found its way into his dumb brain.. than in fact he just reads himself and just sees what he want to believe..
but .. i did not get it fully too.. so maybe you are not that dumb.. maybe.. maybe sorry then.. just maybe.. because old testamentarians did forgive themselfs their wrongness too much .. which is unforgivable.. and only god may forgive their actions with their deaths.. not i.. not you.. that is the factual aspect i maked clearly..”houston, do you read?”
///
Note: The author of this post does not take serious any arguments made by a raging lunitc who is too emotional in their standing. Nor would he take serious anyone dishing out obvious hate. So yes, he isn't going to respond to all his points.
///
My response:
"if morality is violent then kill yourself now but if you are honest if you kill yourself morality is pacifism”
Clean your head
Most violence is based on morality. Plenty of studies on it. Go research it.
Do you think that by killing myself I’ll be doing the world a favor?
What if I was suicidal (luckily for me I am not that weak-minded) and listened to you? Would you be willing to go to jail for it? People have gone to prison for telling others to kill themselves.
Choose your words wisely.
What do you think is the foundation of your cruel manner to want me dead?
M. Jay gave several replies still ignoring any questions made:
1st reply:
you dumbp fukk.... you did just read the half of what i had written to you..
///
We interrupt this message to leave this note.
New Note from yayogerardo to the public first published here on blurtlatam.intinte.org. A true non censorship front end with no shadow banning and preventing others from seeing what is being posted raw on the chain.
Anyways, No I did not. He means this:
"but .. i did not get it fully too.. so maybe you are not that dumb.. maybe.. maybe sorry then.. just maybe.. because old testamentarians did forgive themselfs their wrongness too much .. which is unforgivable.. and only god may forgive their actions with their deaths.. not i.. not you.. that is the factual aspect i maked clearly..”houston, do you read?”
Ha!
Breaking it down.
- "So maybe you are not that dumb"
As if I ever needed his validation. Was this supposed to be a compliment? Why not accept it?
Because if I do I would have to accept his negative validations. So no thank you.
you dumbp fukk....
I wonder, since anger is fear. Is he scared I wont accept his "compliment"?
"Why don't people just pay attention to me!"-M.J.
As for the rest of:
. maybe.. maybe sorry then.. just maybe.. because old testamentarians did forgive themselfs their wrongness too much .. which is unforgivable.. and only god may forgive their actions with their deaths.. not i.. not you.. that is the factual aspect i maked clearly..”houston, do you read?”
Either you are sorry or your not. Does he feel sorry?
Well I am not sorry if he does.
Either way I don't want apologies or need them. If one apologized it would need to be done with action, which equal in value to the insult. That is what has more value than pretty sugar coated words. This fake apology just sets up the lie that comes next.
"because old testamentarians did forgive themselfs their wrongness too much .. which is unforgivable.."
What wrongness is that? Is this just a general idea?
Well it may be so that they forgave themselves , the question would be, did moat change their wrong behaviour afterwards?
"which is unforgivable"
Would you prefer them to NOT find peace and life fulfillment within themselves?
And now,
Accusing me of being part of the christian religion? Well, I did quoted the bible hahaha. "Old Testamentarians"? It was from a section of the old testament. But I not an old testamentarian. Is loving thy enemy a bad thing? Loveinf thy neighbor and enemies is past new and old. It's found in both ends.
Is it not ethical? Is Love not the way? Is love is not law?
Is the public reader discerning from the flaws in his argument. And mine for that matter. I have ego control under wraps. Well good enough I think.. What is your critic on everything? Leave a comment in the public forum.
///
M. Jay continues:
you and your ideological instand soup of opinions..
morality is when you do not lie..
because you are just a little turdy walking lie on two shit sticks which is psychically unable to read adequately..
you blown up nazi blowjob..
kill your self..
2nd:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ZxXOe6SG1qw
clickable images
ODYSEE Decentralized Video Platform
StealthEX to keep your identity protected.
Proof of directly related cross platform promotion
https://substack.com/@yayogerardo/note/c-49059539?r=dbg14
See how it can be double edge sword?
Basically poke myelf in the own eye.
If I use it as I have done above here, I set myself for failure. Live by the example. Lol.
I meant it in jest though.
How do you tell someone that 'you have zero intellectual rigor and most probably a IQ under 95', without saying 'you have zero intellectual rigor and most probably a IQ under 95,' ?
Be careful not to get drawn into a pointless conversations with idiots..- a-la mark twain and his observations...
I have many scars to attest to the validity of mr twain's wisdom's... ! lol
(But well done, matey - Good argument!)
No kidding. They love to drag you down. But I have wings with sharp feathers to cut most nets and fingers.