Ok. So question... Was the @blurtbooster account ninja mined?
If so, I can understand your point of view. There's no skin in the game so it is a bit like introducing printed money into the system.
That being said... I don't think we should burn the amount.
Perhaps what would be better is to offer allotments of the stake (10% per. year perhaps) for sale at fixed prices to existing Blurt members. (Opportunities should go to the people making Blurt better and we would want to avoid a Justin Sun type scenario as well.)
@world-travel-pro do you have any insight here?
Yes we can say that. it was printed by the regent account who printed it for 2 years.
so in your opinion investors should pay for the functioning of blurt booster? the question is whether investors share your enthusiasm. So far, not too many takers.
only you see it like with this post from wtp. Who will decide who these people are? The whole genius of the lack of such solutions was that the one who does something that people want to buy and pay for it and support them earns money. And not the one who is the favorite of the booster holder.