RE: If Blurt looks anything like this in 2 - 3 years, we all win!!! 🏆

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

If Blurt looks anything like this in 2 - 3 years, we all win!!! 🏆

in blurt •  2 years ago 

I think nfts have a use. They are good for in games and for digital artists who genuinely create moving digital art and don’t have other market places. The fact we all pile in is purely money. You don’t rly own anything, once it’s an nft anyone can drag it off full res and print it for free so your relying on someone buying it simply because they think ownnjnt the digital rights might go up in value. I notice a lot of artists who love it and say it helped them just couldn’t Sell work in the real world but are good online so they sold some nfts. I mean that’s fine but they should be honest that’s it was the easiest route for them not a pfefernce on the most part.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
Sort Order:  
  ·  2 years ago  ·  

Yeah, the makers of beanie babies were happy about their invention for a while too. It really made them rich for a flash in the pan. Dutch tulip bulb growers a few hundred years ago were really happy about their idea, but who cares about that now. Even scam artists are happy about making money on what they're selling, doesn't mean the scam is really worth anything. Digital rights are fine, but JPG faces that only differ from each other by a pixel or two are pointless gimmicks. We can have digital rights without childish images and the "they are unique so I gotta collect 'em all" hype mindset.


Posted from https://blurtlatam.intinte.org