I genuinely assumed it must be her managing it. If it’s just that people haven’t noticed she’s doing that then my apologies but I hope it will be fixed quickly because that’s an awful thing for people that are struggling to get upvotes here to see.
RE: Blurtbooster
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Blurtbooster
Sarah you kind of assume everything and end up with the wrong idea. Blurtbooster is a bot and no human manages it.
You kind of make yourself look like a fool everytime by assuming things. Sorry but I had to say this. Your obsession with Opidia is not healthy and you kind of see her everywhere.
Blurtbooster is a bot that is run by the team and no one looks at the posts or the topics.
There are parameters that are checked by Blurtbooster and it votes every post.
It excludes users who are in COAL list.
You assume that users are not getting votes but that's not the responsibility of the Blurt team. The team can give one random vote to a user and can't give them 100 votes from hundred accounts.
Users need to make friends, comment, write engaging content and interact with others to gain attention.
Users can't just write one post and vanish only to return a few days later to write another post.
And the bot is a work in progress. It takes time and experimentation to perfect a bot but there will never be a perfect bot.
There are tens of curation accounts and they are doing their best to help users.
Curation must be a community effort.
I agree with you a little on the new accounts I also said that above when someone suggested it that actually that’s kind of flawed cause as nice as it sounds ppl can just set up 100 accounts etc. It seems if people can find a way to manipulate a system they always will. 😅
I haven’t mentioned Opedia for months so not obsessed but not right that someone literally spamming is the only one that seems to be getting good upvotes from this blurt bot. I don’t care myself happy to not take it and give it to newbies and people who rly need it, defo not to someone spamming tho. I may be wrong that she isn’t controlling it, it just seemed very dodgy but someone is turning a blind eye that’s for sure.
Literally spamming doesn't mean what you think it does. I think you called her out a half dozen times at least..
Hundreds ... if she would tag me i could litteraly sue her
That is called intense trolling spamming
I wish people would stop telling me how obsessed she is with me
She is paid by the gang , gets her fat upvotes like that ..everyone knows
Don't let it sour you, I don't think she's doing it on purpose, like a fool, she tries not to be foolish and keeps failing at being wise. If she does it to glee, I say give her more bile, if it so fuels her, but I wouldn't expect to fill her appetite.
no time to waste on a nasty trans seeking attention on social medias .
Anyone can be nice but mental disorder is a plague and here on Blurt we have a whole wagon .
Don't fall into the trap of thinking yourself a psychologist, if you see so much mental disorder here and consider it a waste of time then how are you any better?
I dont see myself as a psychologist , mental disorder dont bother me much and you are right , no one to judge , i actually enjoy deeply the freedom we have here to just show different colors .
I love the chaos of Blurt .
Which account are you referring to, I don’t keep an eye on individual account happenings I focus on Blurt at a macro level.
The opidia account is getting one of the highest upvotes from blurt booster when all it does is repost the exact same text with a new image every day and self upvote. I know we don’t have an issue with self upvoting here but I don’t think these are th types of accounts deserving of some extra boosting lol. I did wrongly assume she must have had some kind of access to it due to getting such high upvotes and the people she doesn’t like getting none and her making a comment about that but I think from talking to Imran it was just coincidence so happy to accept being wrong on that and jumping to the wrong conclusion. But it definitely needs a little rewiring.
No special treatment, nor does she have the keys, she has been very focussed on trying to optimise for it, I think she’s spoken to every member of the team to try find out how Blurtbooster works, watching how it votes etc. I was as vague as possible like I was with you giving the tip to increase your word count, maybf she got one piece of info from each of the team. If you spent that much time on it i’m sure you would get those votes too, but perhaps the votes should be capped to maybe 5% per user what do you think?
Someoen suggested to newbies but when I thought on it further I thought you’ll just end up with ppl starting 100 new accounts. It gets exhausting after a bit how far some people will go to game a few £ a day from a system. Maybe we just have to accept it, it doesn’t rly seem to work out for people that much I mean opidia is spending all this time gaming 70 p from blurt booster or whatever a day but lost all genuine interaction and upvotes. Maybe we just have to leave things to natural community selection sometimes.
I’m honestly not too bothered about it, like I said above I get a good community support. It would be nice for blurt to go up in value of course as we all would like. I am more of an artist really and not everything always requires that many words else I’m just making it up for post length. I prefer to be totally authentic and just post what I feel when it comes to text with art, nothint annoys me more than writing bullshit for the sake of filling up word space to get an upvote lol sometimes I prefer to just post an image. But I honestly don’t care if I get it or not I just don’t like seeing it going to a total spammer. It would be better all pooled together and going to developers or something than people just abusing the system.
Yeah that would have been cool for instablurt which focussed on insta type pic posts but we stopped all manual official curation accounts in favour of Blurtbooster, anyhow I have something you might like, come join a group with wtp and otm on Discord and will tell u.
Sure sure :) honestly I don’t cate about it for myself it’s 30 p after payout maybe that’s 1/15th of a cappuccino I’m more of a principle person. I just hate seeing ppl game the system like that.
I think cryptopie figured it out too, he is getting 12% i’ve been told.
I think he deserves it he always makes nice long original posts and never begs for help for his medical issues. Always hoping for the best for him
I do admire the tenacity and dedication taken to figure it out, flattering to a degree that blurtbooster is so important to some. Both those who try optimise for it and those who call it out.
I mean it’s about 30 p isn’t it after payout. One could find that on the floor if they look hard and keep their eyes open. I guess over time it could become bigger tho as blurt goes up in value and sometimes it is important to nip some issues in the bud early. I guess there is a clear divide between using the platform to make optimum investment with as little day to day input as possible and actually wanting to build a social community it seems. I don’t think it’s cleverness as we could all start doing it tmrw now we know but it’s more peoples intentions on how to engage with fellow man. I still think the CIA must have started steemit it’s the world’s best social experiment really.