I think fb is centralised of course it never promises not to be . I write whatever I want there tho and speak freely and despite a few bans here and there I can am still on the feed get high engagement and can sell anything I want on the fb market place. So it’s actually nothing like as bad as hive. Is it good ? No defo not it also spies on conversation, targets ads all kinds of bullshit but I don’t think anyone’s unaware of what it does. But yeah I feel more free there than on hive that’s for sure lol and surprisingly less censored as I can still use the shop features if I wanted to.
RE: If I Was Still On Hive
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
If I Was Still On Hive
Yeah, Facebook who bans and censors extensively is more free than hive.
Yes because it’s at least individual to one post. It’s still terrible don’t get me wrong but at least after ban your back to full standing and can sell things and post goes onto the feed. Same after a censored post the next one is ok again. You can just spell it in a different way and your good to even post the same post again. It’s essy to work the fb system cause it’s all bots. There is a group on there who has been going for two years and helps ppl travel without vaccine passports etc it’s never been taken down cause everyone’s careful how they speak. It’s not a good site at all, it’s terrible but it is a little better than hive
Lololol! Actual censorship, where anyone can censor anyone else on their posts, where people, entire groups, etc, are routinely banned, that's better than being curated on hive.
HIVE is NOT curation, curation is reading a post and giving an opinion or support if you like it, it's not curation to downvote ppl on every single post and comment they make, even in advance sometimes on auto vote just cause they took money out that they earnt, they post on another site, they have a second account (just like all the downvoters do too) and all the other bullshit reasons these thought police want to give as an excuse. Using the curation excuse is absolute bullshit. Oh and no one can curate them back cause a couple of downvotes and they will just nuke harder.... anyone with a lot of money there, mostly gained unfairly including by having accounts on the site BEFORE everyone else was allowed to join can essentially make it so everyone else is even AFRAID to curate. It's not curating if people are afraid to vote for posts they like cause they will get nuked off the site lol
It is curation, regardless of how you feel about it. It's curation even if it's terrible.
No it’s not Do you actually know the definition of curation because I don’t think it’s what you think it is
What do you think it is that I think it is and how is it not curation?
Curate
That is satisfied by the act of voting for or against whatever each stakeholder deems to be "the best" or "most appropriate" for each content.
You're such a brainless faggot you claim that censorship is curation and actual censorship isn't really censorship. You are a fagtastic entitled moron that you think a post being rewarded almost 700 dollars is what you're entitled to, and don't think 80 bucks is fair, faggot, yes.
if they really believe in curation let ppl make anonymous downvotes I bet things would change a lot on that site lol
It being anonymous doesn't magically turn it into curation. Its curation regardless of it being anonymous or public.
It absolutely does because at the moment nobody actually dares curate because there is a tiny handful of people that can obliterate any individual and they may will be on their own with their tiny downvote. If people could actually cure rate anonymously they would probably downvote these people back and the down votes would actually mount up and who knows. It would certainly be a little more Fair than a small group of people being able to control the the entire site and he was allowed to earn money and not allowed to earn money through fear.
What a load of crap. Everyone who votes curates regardless of your nonsensical lies. You want it to be anonymous because you think down voting people who down vote is what will fix anything. That's the most faggot reason to down vote, and its as petty as it is childish, self defeating, and faggot.
I guess you have mastered the word faggot 🤣
curation is meant to be post based it’s not oh you wanna nuke a newbie for fun or you don’t like a person so you’re going to auto vote them before they even posed that’s not curation. Or you’re going to get with your other little whale friends and pick on anybody that defends somebody that you just down voted and your organise that you do down vote for an hour before pay out. It’s really bizarre you’re making some bizarre excuses for these absolutely shadiest of the shady people on a site that has absolutely zero decentralisation it’s crazy reading your excuses,
My excuses? Get out of here, you keep spreading lies, woo and utter nonsense and have just claimed that down voting people who down vote is some kind of answer to you not liking that people downvote, and this is after you argued that Facebook and YouTube is more decentralized while hive has not even 1% of the total vests in any 4 accounts that are curating. Yeah hive isn't perfect but to claim such absurd nonsense after you suggested to @drutter to make numerous accounts and EARN ON HIVE is the high noon of hypocrisy and absurdity. You're also deluded as fuck if you think ANY post is worth 80 bucks, let alone 700. How the fuck does that relate to the real world or any other content site that you feel entitled to such payouts and ain't grateful for making 80 buck, 60 more than what I and many consider a reasonable high payout that's rich. You owe hive much more than you'll ever admit,which is why you're a faggot, salty and full of bullshit nonsense and absurdity.
Lol ok your acrually not rly sane or able to hold adult conversation I think I’ve wasted too much time here already today 🤣
Let’s Have a look at the actual definition of curation shall we. Funnily enough it doesn’t say the art of silencing any opinion that you don’t like or nuking somebody to 0 and not allowing them to make any money on a platform because you personally don’t like them I don’t seem to be able to read that here in the definition. They curate on the saatchi art website and guess what I don’t see anybody not able to sell paintings because they didn’t get curated on there. all excuses absolute bollocks excuse my French.
‘Curation is a field of endeavor involved with assembling, managing and presenting some type of collection. Curators of art galleries and museums, for example, research, select and acquire pieces for their institutions’ collections and oversee interpretation, displays and exhibits.
In an IT (information technology) context, there are several different but often overlapping types of curation. These include:
Data curation – The management of data throughout its lifecycle, from creation and initial storage to the time when it is archived or becomes obsolete and is deleted.
Digital curation – The management of any kind of digital data, through the use of software and other digital technology.
content curation – The oversight of a collection of Web content arranged around a particular theme or subject area.
Social curation – The collaborative oversight of collections of Web content organized around types of content. Pinterest, for example, is a collaborative site for sharing and organizing images’
https://www.techtarget.com/whatis/definition/curation
And? Curating something as of no value or even negative value is still curative.
you know outside the hive cabal I have never gotten ONE downvote, NEVER. not on steemit, not on d tube etc funny that.
So? The cabal doesn't have more power than the rest of hive, not even 1%.
Yes they do. Even one of them is enough to nuke a smaller user to a minus reputation and make it so they are unable to earn any money on the platform. This Singling out with people and down voting anybody that supports people that have been down voted means nobody dares down vote back And gives them absolute power. I admit that if everybody had the balls to stand up to these people it would be a very different place but unfortunately the majority are completely living in fear and keeping their head down so they don’t get down voted. That has absolutely nothing to do with curation, curation is curating and organising post that you like and displaying them to other people, it isn’t making people live in fear that they will be unable to earn any money if they speak up, defend somebody who is getting down voted, take their own money out of the site or have an opinion someone else doesn’t like. That is not curation and I don’t know where you’re getting your weird definitions for curation from.
No they don't. People also are free to do as they please, nobody can stop them from posting and commenting and curating, only themselves.
Most these people now have a reputation where it can’t be tainted with downvotes and I’m sure I read somewhere that the 10 top whales can pretty much take on anyone at this point.
So? Reputation is a meaningless, completely irrelevant metric. The top 10 whales, which aren't colluding, still don't have any substantial stake compared with the rest of hive.