I don’t mind playing and testIng out various coding that applies to everyone. Try it and see what happens, maybe it works, maybe it doesn’t. I don’t mind people playing with code and seeing if it makes the site a better experience, What I don’t like is one person deciding who gets frozen, assets stolen, removed etc. There is a mute button for a reason that no one seems to like using they just cry that to md that someone hurt their feelings and he panders to them and makes a mockery of this site. It’s quite frankly embarrassing to watch. These people want this else they would just mute and move on but notice they NEVER use the mute button because they secretly like the attention and creating this drama and they are crashing this site.
A lot of us came here because we didn’t like a small bunch of rich people dictating who could get any rewards or engage on a platform, now we just have one person doing it! This person is also driving off all the biggest investors. In only a few months I’ve seen 4 of the biggest account holders and investors being chased off. What on earth is that for business sense? Does md want this platform to fail ?
We have no way to vote on or make proposals properly yet Md is paying his friends 700 dollars to make sandals and no one has been asked? I’ve also heard that opidia was paid a huge amount to use a photo that no one even liked for various reasons. Is this true? We need more transparency and please make the proposals something people can vote on democratically so it’s not just handing money to friends. This is really not what Blockchain is about. I’m really glad you at least seem to have a voice of reason here, pleAse step up and in before this token is worth 0. A lot of us hve invested a lot of time and or money here and to watch one person drive this platform into the ground is really depressing. A lot of us came here with high hopes.
@nabeeel is someone I met recently, he did make an open post requesting funding for the Blurt slipper business, we discussed internally and funded him, if every $700 spent went under community discussion it would result in endless discussion. I really don’t think it’s fair saying a poor Pakistani guy who just got a hand up is only getting it because he is a friend or something.
We also helped fund adding Blurt to ecosynthesiser and joinblurt.com among other things.
There is misinformation about opidia, she provided the cover image at no cost, she has never been paid anything by Blurt Core. Also note the “investors” you speak of were left alone by me and Blurt core, they each had agendas and started manipulations and propaganda and were responded to accordingly, you can see Double-u had no concern for the community on his way out as he rage tanked the price, everyone knows this.
Real investors generally work with the community, not try force agendas with their stake.
I disagree on proposals it should be put to the community vote to some extent otherwise it’s a back hand deal. @world-travel-pro said his cousin who did advertising for Disney was interested in providing services at a really good rate yet no one ever followed it up. We mentioned it to numerous witnesses and she offered to have a call with you or a witness and she came on and made a post and was totally ignored. Now I understand if someoen chatted with her and decided it wasn’t the right movement and didn’t want to do anything with her but no one even bothered talking to her. Yet someone is given 700 dollars just to be given a hand up. Sorry but that’s charity not blockchain. Decisions like proposals should involve the community imo and not just one man deciding who to give money to for various personal projects. I heavily disagree with this kind of thing, it is not fair and does not support blurt as a community. You discussed this most likely in private with him and handed him blurt tokens, if you feel sorry for someone you could give them your own blurt from your own investment. If you think it’s a really good idea for the platform and will really help blurt let the community vote on it.
I’m not only blaming you for investors leaving there is always two sides to a story but I don’t think you have helped. These people make the platform useable for people since they curate good posts. I think there are better ways to handle and deal with people bringing a lot to a platform than freezing them because you can’t agree.
I supported both you and blurt but seeing this and some other things lately like this freezing list has really made me lose all trust. You can’t deny you speak to this guy personally and you just gave him 700 dollars to do something through the back door essentially and no one else can get any proposals through at all or have a say in it. I thought the whole point of Blockchain is that it’s a community platform not one man with ultimate power and decision making. It is not difficult to make a page of proposals that community members can vote on and would not be endless discussion at all. Maybe only things that hit 60 percent yes get discussed by the team. This screams back door deals otherwise.
It is unfortunate that they now only see the consequences of an action done. They are so blind to the issue in question. If those accounts didn't do anything wrog no one wouldd talk about them. It is better for everyone to be objective and call a spade a spade instead of paying allegiance to the highest bidder instead on standing for right and refuting wrongs.
No this is not true.
It was an exchange of different type of tokens so to not effect the blurt price. Opidia even poweres up those blurt which in turn helped the price stabilize. I would have done the same.
Ok well good that that’s confirmed I would have been well disappointed if she was handed 1 million blurt for a photo I’m glad that’s only a rumour.
So would I. But this is the internet. Many people lie and love to spread rumors. We are all guilty of it from time to time, but mostly its from the lack of not researching. As rychard so pointed out to me too.
Truth and honesty is what is going to keep this world going. Imo.
Completely agree when you catch someoen out lying you can never really trust them on anything I think and when ppl cover up to look a bit better it generally ends up worseZ
no one is driving blurt into the ground.
I don't want proposals at this time.
People threatening to freeze accounts and chase off big investors are running the price down, surely no one can deny this? It’s causing people to not feel safe to invest and want to withdraw as they have no faith or trust anymore.
Proposals or not proposals doesn’t matter but do you not think it’s kind of unfair that there are proposals if your mds friend but not for anyone else? I guess I just like fairness and equality. It’s not really fair if the only people that get a proposal are people who are friends with the boss.
100% THIS
Make it easier: no one censored or frozen.
well, i was somewhat concerned when mega talked about blurt being "family-friendly" in his interview
have you seen the first episode of "the boys" season 3 ?
it's a show owned by amazon
just imagine if someone posted that stuff on hive or steem or blurt ?
way worse than frot or lucy
they would get insta-banned
but amazon is somehow "considered mainstream" and yet can produce and distribute this stuff to viewers world-wide
what the hell
I 💜 U
❤️