But, even if we did, that should be between the person who owned the stake and the person receiving it for whatever reason they were given it.
Right, so back to the future. The way to support projects is to create a project account, fund it and give the manager the posting key while the funder retains ownership.
Property and functions are different and separate.
The other way is to create tokens and sell them - with or without incentives.
Need more flow of money, else this can become stagnant and routine.... could easily become Steem.
That would be above my level of knowledge, lol. I feel no shame though as I believe that would be the common experience in relation to this. I still don't understand the logistics even, using the Blurtyield as an example. What I (think) I see is folks sending in Blurt and it is being used to purchase hive? Yet some of it seems to go into the Blurtyield account too?
Overall I don't understand how that is bringing in outside money as it seems to me it places more Blurt into trading circulation to accumulate a separate currency (Hive). While I don't wish harm on Hive as so many coming over seem to, I also don't wish to support their project and token which is part of why I liquidated all my HE tokens quickly to power up here.
I'm sure I revealed a lot of ignorance in my above questions, but i just don't see how accumulating Hive tokens from Blurt tokens brings in more money.
Based on that structure, the only difference I can see from that side of the equation is the person being delegated to is receiving the curation rewards. Would it then be fair to say it's that aspect of the equation you dislike?
For an example I'll use myself as Jacob has given me a large delegation. Do you find it repugnant that he gave me this ability to curate and receive the rewards from that?
As far as running a second account, I spend to much time on one account, lol. I honestly don't know how you keep up with it.