Ok, thank you.

For perception purposes, it might be worth the recipients consideration to return the extra allocations that were never intended as they receive them so they can maintain their good standing and be above reproach such as this post we're commenting on is wrongfully directing at the Foundation.

I don't have a bone in this personally, but it's a legitimate concern despite the error in presentation that was made. Both recipients are respected members and developers in the community and would hate to see this oversight become a valid opportunity for criticism to their otherwise stellar contributions.