Return Proposal was removed.
Backup Return Proposal is printing BLURT for DAO, so symbionts and eastmael are getting paid DOUBLE!
https://ecosynthesizer.com/blurt/@symbionts.pay
https://ecosynthesizer.com/blurt/@symbionts
Vote this proposal to stop the steal from DAO
Uncensored comments: https://blurtlatam.com/blurt/@mariuszkarowski/placeholder
🤬 Bookmark 🥓
printing machine invented by megadrive
https://ecosynthesizer.com/blurt/@blurt.dao
Most blockchains are printing machines, that's what they call inflation. But you knew that since Steem and Hive (and Bitcoin etc) are also inflationary (printing machines).
Hello to you,
I am interested in this debate in principle, but I do not yet understand your position.
You are referred to and seen as one of the big whales/investors here. Did you buy in here at a time when the Blurt token was much higher in price? The possibility of acquiring Blurt tokens was only possible through the spin-off of Steemit, correct?
Are you somehow angry about a return of investment that didn't materialise? What exactly is it that enrages you? I don't understand. Saying that others have "too much" is not an argument, is it? Others may always have more than you, that doesn't mean you have to be dissatisfied?
The millions that are constantly talked about here, which the founders have made their own, should be released by them, do I see that correctly as one of your demands? Where should they give these tokens? Why should they do that? These are not rhetorical questions, but seriously meant by me.
Are you also saying that the witnesses are overpaid as devs or programmers for what they do? That may or may not be true, I myself have no technical knowledge to check such things or even to follow the payment flows.
What would be your counter-proposal?
Do you want an upper limit for the payment of witnesses? If so, where would this cap be? And how would you then check whether this would be respected (if someone accepted this as a rule)? How would you evaluate the quality and quantity of the witnesses' work? Who would then check this regularly? And in case of non-compliance, what would be the consequence? Do you want to be involved in spending your time monitoring and punishing compliance with such rules?
If you were the head of this service (or its founder), how would you want to run the place?
These questions aside, you seem to be good at spotting inconsistencies in transactions. Why not make your talent a permanent partner of those who work here? What would be wrong with that? You seem to like it do dig into this kind of material.