The question is: Who defines quality? Do the number of words, pictures, followers or the amount of blurt power mean that someone post qualitativ content? I don't think so. The whole Blurt community defines what quality is. The community decides which posts they like and which they don't. And this can be seen by the number and percent power of upvotes and/or comments.
RE: High quality content … is it really necessary?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
High quality content … is it really necessary?
I think the other guys is right it’s probably comments and engagement. If something is super long and gets 2 -4 comments not really deeply on the post … no one read it basically. I think a lot of people and myself included have a habit of upvoting things that are just long and look like the person put on effort… no way are all the upvotes reading them all.