AT THE TIME OF POSTING, @NEWEXPERIENCE IS NOT ON MUTE.

THE ACCOUNTS UNDERNEATH ARE ON MUTE

I'M POSTING THIS FOR REASONS OFF BLURT - AS A TIME STAMP.

BELOW, IS A COPY PASTE FROM THE @LUCYLIN COMMENT.
(THAT CANNOT BE SEEN ON BLURT.BLOG).

(BLURTLATAM.INTINTE.ORG IS CENSORSHIP FREE AND ALL COMMENTS ARE VISIBLE).

THE REASON FOR THIS POST IS ABOUT DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING PSYCHOLOGY, MID-WITS, AND THE PREDICTABLE ACTIONS OF INDIVIDUALS WITH THIS PATHOLOGY WITH A DIRECTED (AND INTENTIONAL) EXTERNAL STIMULUS.

THIS DISCUSSION IS OFF BLURT.
(it will not be available on the blurt platform.)

@lucylin in blurt • 44 minutes ago
(copy/paste.)

Again, I totally agree and think your logic makes perfect sense especially when applied to a "social" blockchain.

And yet you SELF UPVOTE all your own posts and use coconut curation for the same purpose, (and now probably blurt booster) to self upvote.

Could you explain how you reconcile this very obvious contradictory position?
When expediency trumps principles, you may well find a midwit...
@wil.metcalfe - and many others - would love to know..
Another case 'The T-shirt doesn't say how the mouth behaves?'
(It's becoming a bit of a habit, isn't it ?).

oh, you've already self upvoted this post ! ..lol

Furthermore @blurtbooster is about raising up those who deserve it,

How do you define 'those that deserve it' - is sycophancy more deserving than truth, for example ?
(your supervision?..silence).

and votes across the general user base under my supervision with the help of others. We focus on supporting those putting greater effort into social capital and posting quality which drives interaction.

......oh, that will work out really well for the growth of the platform, then...what could possibly go wrong ?...s/