I don't understand how curation can cost you 1400 BLURT to generate only 230 BLURT?
RE: Curating is damn expensive!
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Curating is damn expensive!
Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
Hi @nalexadre, I am no longer active here and only care! Therefore, please excuse the late response.
I had registered with an auto voter. The cost of 1400 blurt was incurred because every transaction, including voting, costs. In return, I received a share of 230 blurt for the votes distributed by the auto-voter.
I don't know how long and which auto-voter you used, but there's something wrong!
Let's take the example of the BeBlurt Delegation Program, something I'm familiar with as I'm its creator. This program returns 85% of the rewards to its delegators (while retaining 15% for BeBlurt development, including daily transfer fees and voting fees). If you delegate 40K BLURT POWER to @beblurt, you will receive a daily transfer of 8 to 10 BLURT (constituting the 85% share). Calculating the retained 15%, this amounts to 1.2 to 1.5 BLURT per day. Therefore, it would take 3 years to reach a "cost" of 1,400 BLURT (the transfer/voting fees part of these 1,400 BLURT is ridiculous considering @beblurt's 3.4 million BLURT POWER and the majority of this amount will be dedicated to the dev of BeBlurt.). However, during that same 3 years, you would receive 10,000 BLURT.