My View on Auto voting and Manual Voting

Having a successful engagement in all communities comes from the level of impact the member's are willing to contribute to the community, honestly I sincerely hope and believe that having members that has long time vision is one thing that is very important and vital and to me this will contribute to the development of the community.

Image source

One thing am very much concern about as a new user, especially after having 75% rewards staked automatically in the community is that the CURATION decision of the community members has a long way to go in helping growth system in the community.

Honestly right now my blurt power is still very low,but using them to me is very important as that is one way I can contribute for now and get to grow more in the community,for now am still very much particular about the blurt community as that is where am more used to.

Recently lot of new development are coming to showcase themselves on the platform which as indeed give me one thought that the best is still yet to come and it is good to see that the blurt is becoming very promising,base on my opinion it rapid growth too didn't just come easily,it as to do with lot of engagement, cause since have been on the platform have noticed that engagement is a very vital instrument to the community development.

Have been able to access some Post which have engaged with the user's and honestly it is good to see how well it is cause without engagement no community will survive silence of it members,but base on my own opinion,I sincerely think lot should be done In order to give credit to members who engage well enough daily.

How well do people get rewarded while they engage in the community, apart from the fact they make most comments which I thought they might later be rewarded on,what else do they get in return,just asking though?

Curating Manually For Engagement

I sincerely think @blurt and other user's concern should do something about curation while it comes to engagement.I might be wrong with this opinion and I stand to be corrected on this,most users who engage well enough are not good at posting of content at all,am of the opinion that not everyone can write articles.

So what is the hope of those who engage alone

I sincerely believe that at times engagement rewards at times might bring fraudulent act ,as some user's might only be doing it for rewards sake or Looking for a means of manipulation too,but I think curating Manually , most especially for users on the list often and often is not a bad motive.even though have never been on the list before.

I sincerely notice that some user's as won the hearts of some people in the community and irrespective of what they post or comment made by them they get upvoted for it,I sincerely noticed that it is the work of bot or what I see as auto voting which am one way against a little bit.

Come to look at it this way , what is the hope of a new users in this auto voting system and do everyone get rewarded via this Means.?

To me curating manually give you the room to understand and see what a specific users as passed through before relating his/her message ,it also gives room for you to see how well structured their works are.

I know that curating manually might look hard to some users and that is what they have listed some trusted users to get upvoted at anything they do,but what is the efficient of those works at times,do we ever consider that.

To me curating manually helps the community a lot and it makes it clear for us all to know who is who and who is doing the job well enough.am not saying their should be an end to auto voting or an end to the trust we have in some users,but my view is this:

How efficient is auto voting compare to manual voting.