At the point when Prime Minister Dr. Bishr Al-Khasawneh and Minister of Health Dr. Nazir Obeidat got the principal portion of the antibody, the official media were quick to explain and affirm that what was implied by this was the Emirati-Chinese immunization, and that the inoculation cycle came with regards to the trial period of the antibody, which included many Jordanian volunteers.
The matter didn't cause a commotion or inquiries among the general assessment, yet rather an appreciation for the president's step, and everybody comprehended that the objective of "immunizing" the clergymen was to energize residents sometime in the future to acknowledge immunizations and not stop for a second to take them.
The date of giving the second portion to whomever of the authorities wants concurred with the presentation of the "Pfizer" immunization in the United States and Britain and its appearance in various nations in the locale, and certain individuals and the media might have befuddled the matter, as they couldn't help thinking that a portion of the "great individuals" acquired specially the antibody that was given to them. It has been authoritatively endorsed.
Obviously, that never occurred, however the news distributed by our associate Jamal Haddad proposed that the antibody got by the Secretary-General of the Ministry of Education was Pfizer. The precision of the data might have been affirmed before distribution.
Be that as it may, did this confuse call with the associate to be alluded to the State Security Court and captured? obviously not.
In the first place, the authorities who got the test immunization after the clergymen must be quick to make it clear in their distributions that they had gotten the Emirati-Chinese antibody to forestall confounding residents when bits of gossip filled the internet, assuming it was vital by any means to unveil their receipt of the antibody.
All that occurs in such cases is a sensation in the media that subverts Jordan's notoriety, discolors its regard for press opportunities, and spots it in the position of nations that abuse opportunities. Typically, following a couple of days, the specialists consent to support the captured columnist, and we don't hear anything of the case once more.
For what reason do we bring our country an awful standing, when truth be told we are obviously superior to other people and can create from our involvement with a way that places us in the positions of created nations?!
Nobody protects proficient maltreatments in distributing cases, and assuming we grow more via web-based media stages, the objection about the defilement of its moral and expert substance hurts everybody without segregation between an authority or a common resident, and whoever circles back to the cases considered in the courts inside the cybercrime law will handily see an expansion in their numbers drastically It is huge, and that the majority of it is activated by conventional residents and not by government authorities.
Authorities ought to have more tolerance, and not be brought into their feelings in any event, when the media blunder, since this subverts the endeavors of the state and society to address the genuine lopsided characteristics in the internet, and rally support against dishonest practices in interpersonal interaction locales, and outer publicity that attempts to drive wedges Discord and conflict between state foundations and residents.
Leave the new year alone the start of another period in press opportunities, in which we, as writers, pronounce our adherence to the honorable settlements, poise and association, and in which the specialists stop the act of capturing columnists before their preliminary, and totally overlay the standard of detainment as a discipline in distributing cases.
