do you believe upvoting spam comments for $10,000 to $20,000 per day counts as "supporting high quality original content" ?
RE: If I Was Still On Hive
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
If I Was Still On Hive
Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
You are now moving on from one dead end avenue to another. Your question is premised on the absurd notion of $10000-$20000/ day rewards from nothing but spam comments, which is a complex question fallacy since if I answer it with a negation I'm going along with the absurd and clearly false premise.
i'm not sure the ocdb supporters are aware they are contributing $3,617.73 every single day to these SPAM posts (by hbd.funder)
i'm not sure the ocdb supporters are aware they are contributing to a constant barage of MASSIVE OPINION BASED DOWNVOTES (ocdb is the biggest downvoter)
they're mostly under the general impression that they are supporting "high-quality-original-content" (which would be wonderful if that's all they did)
And what do you suggest?
perhaps maybe doing what they claim
And what if they don't?
then i'll simply point that out
How, where and when?
here and now and then and there