anyway,
that's why the mute button was invented
can you imagine trying to "clean up" the entire internet ?
what kind of enforcement mechanism would you personally prefer ?
RE: Blurt Community Survey....Is Now The Time to Force the Weak Hands Out?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Blurt Community Survey....Is Now The Time to Force the Weak Hands Out?
I don’t think anyone is saying to block him tho, we even stoood up for him in that regard I just wish ppl would stoP giving so much attention at the expense of growing the Site. Let’s collectively decide to stop from today.
i'm pretty sure magadrive was either blocking them from blurtwallet.com or seriously considering it
"because they upvote crappy posts"
in other words, "they don't spend their own money wisely enough"
Oh god are we still there I genuinely thought md had improved a lot lately and was beginning to look for some community concensus before acting. Tekraze seems the most unhinged and overly sensitive witness these days.
https://blurtlatam.com/ethics/@tekraze/riaxqj
I mean most his posts don’t even make sense to me and swing about all over the place. Some ppl are just better at the tech side than the public facing and no shame in that.
Tekraze is there because no one else is willing to work that blockchain programme at the same rate. He may be a good developer but he rly shouldn’t have a public facing role. I think he wins the award as the most triggered, unhinged, forces his rules onto everyone whilst pretending to like freedom of speech witness Ive seen since leaving hive. He could single handedly damage blurt imo whilst he has a public facIng role.
After thinking that time frame over.....I think we all witnessed a total meltdown. As I've said before some people are not cut out to handle and deal with such controversial personalities humiliating the shit out of them on a daily basis, and we got a total fucking meltdown. Then @jacobkadiaken who was emotionaly outside of the drama, yet pulling major weight as a founder, quickly put common sense to the forefront and the only change that happened was a more fair witness voting system.
Part of why I started a witness, is so I can help prevent blunders like this happening again going forward. While opening up a greater voice to the community in my survey style posts and more....
i'd like to see at least 4 witnesses in the top 20 that do practically nothing and simply ignore all proposals
Who needs the mute button when you have balls of steel! lol
i mean, sure, but what about all the precious snowflakes like magadrive ?
Does it offend you that some would prefer to mute than be trolled?
of course not
i wish magadrive would just mute lucylin and forget about it
that's what the mute function is designed for
Not sure why so many assume he didn't.
because they went a step further and started tagging all their posts with "NSFW"
which would seem fully redundant if they couldn't even see them
I'm assuming that it's likely that he for the most part has muted him and is informed from time to time by one of his team members on what is going on there. He is a busy man and I doubt that he spends all this time that Lucy and some of his followers would like us to believe.
I believe (my own assumption) that it's more likely someone else that was tagging it knowing that it wouldn't be frowned upon. I know of the two of them (mega and lucy) one of the two can't seem to go more than a few paragraphs often without mentioning the other, and the other rarely mentions the other one. We all know which one is wearing which shoes, lol.
Sometimes when you poke the bear the bear will finally stop and poke back. I'm leaning towards one of the bears associates decided to poke, especially since all of the bears associates seem to be getting poked a lot too.
Moving past the who is doing it guessing game, I will say that it is taking place on a front end level which is private property. I support the owners right to decide that shit talking about them non stop as well as everyone who is close to them is NSFW, or for that matter no longer allowing that user to utilize their interface.
Not something I would do, but I support it.
If I was the owner, I would create a new list to go with hot trending and new and call it proof of free speech and push all the shit talking posts right there for the world to see and laugh at the delusions of censorship.
But not my front end.
their inability to simply ignore what they don't like
and their insistence on on making blurt "family friendly"
is a bit of a concern
also, it would be interesting if you had to "opt-in" before one of the "front-ends" could display your writing