rules are fine
coercion is frowned upon
anarchy doesn't mean "no rules" it means "no rulers"
no kings no priests no prophets
Blurt Charter of Rights and Freedoms. 🤬
rules are fine
coercion is frowned upon
anarchy doesn't mean "no rules" it means "no rulers"
no kings no priests no prophets
So we want anarchy here ?
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchy
The following comes from "The most Dangerous Superstition" by Larken Rose
What do you think we want?
The more I study anarchism the more I realized I always was an anarchist only made to forget it at an early age and now having to come back to it so I can coexist and flourish with the rest of this worlds inhabitants.
Anarchy does not mean no rules. WE know that there are laws. Real laws. Mans laws are different, they sre just opinions back with the threat of violence for disobeying.
As Jaque fresco said, the issue we are having is a technical issue. Albeit not many of us are technicians in regards to this chain, but we do not need to know code to be able to understand cause and effect.
Having a charter or some sort of legal documentation to "protect" our rights is just childs play. Every individual has to protect their own freedoms and we all have a moral responsibility to help our neighbors when their rights are being stumped on, because if they are getting stomped on, your next.
GOVERNMENT = SANTA CLAUSE
while i generally agree with this
when you're en-coding guardrails into an en-coded system (like blurt or bitcoin or kleros)
the code itself must embody certain principles
ANARCHY = NO KINGS
ANARCHY = DEMOCRACY
ANARCHY = NO PRIESTS NO PROPHETS NO OLIGARCHS
ANARCHY = NO "LEADERS" ONLY "PUBLIC SERVANTS"
ANARCHY = BLOCKCHAIN
ANARCHY = HOLACRACY
ANARCHY = TRANSPARENCY
ANARCHY = PROCRUSTEAN LAW
(1) PROTECT YOURSELF
(2) PROTECT YOUR FAMILY
(3) PROTECT YOUR PROPERTY
Everyone seems to love the idea of Anarchy. We need a new Front end called Anarchy.blog
or anarch.io
https://anarchy.blog/
Lots of options.
Who writes the rules ?
"we the people"