Maybe we need a Blurt Charter of Rights ….
PART I
Blurt Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms
1 The Blurt Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by Blurt as can be demonstrably justified in a Free society.
Fundamental Freedoms
Marginal note: Fundamental freedoms
2 Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms:
(a) Freedom of conscience and religion;
(b) Freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication;
(c) freedom of peaceful assembly; and
(d) freedom of association.
Other Rights
Marginal note: Blurt rights of citizens
3 Every citizen of Blurt has the right to vote in an election of a Blurt Witness.
Mobility Rights
Marginal note: Mobility of Blurt citizens
4 Every citizen of Blurt has the right to enter, remain in and leave Blurt.
Legal Rights
Marginal note: Life, liberty and security of person
5 Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.
Marginal note:Treatment or punishment
6 Everyone has the right not to be subjected to any cruel and unusual treatment or punishment.
Equality Rights
Marginal note: Equality before and under Blurt and equal protection and benefit of Blurt Community.
7 Every individual is equal before and under the Blurt Charter and has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of Blurt without discrimination and, in particular, without discrimination based on race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, sex, age or mental or physical disability.
8 Most important of all. Be Happy and have fun.
The moment one needs a guarantee ( approval , permission ) for rights and freedom ,.. it is no longer a right or freedom ,.. it became controlled . ,.. centralized even ,.. so , no , please stop your rambling ,.. go woke go broke ,.. is just around the corner from your , well meant , but faulty charter plan .
Didn't you learn anything those past 2.5 years ? ,... sigh .. it's hopeless , this world . I give up .
Have a nice day ,.. and have fun yeah ,. as long as it will last .
;-)
One , on the town market-square , you can not take for free or stop others from doing trade with each other .
Two , on the town market-square , you can't stop others do payments with their own property .
Three , on the town market-square , i do not have to show a id to do a trade .
Those are no rules ,.. that's common sense .
We all can make up our own rules of engagement ,.. or rules to judge others on ,.. but we may never force those rules on to others ,.. as they already have there own rules in place . And freedom means letting others have the freedom to live by there own rules .
The voluntary agorist peaceful anarchist way ,.. no need for a overlord set of rules or demanding system . ;-)
identifying "like-minded" individuals seems to be the tough part
Hear, hear.
No Rules allowed.
rules are fine
coercion is frowned upon
anarchy doesn't mean "no rules" it means "no rulers"
no kings no priests no prophets
So we want anarchy here ?
Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchy
The following comes from "The most Dangerous Superstition" by Larken Rose
What do you think we want?
The more I study anarchism the more I realized I always was an anarchist only made to forget it at an early age and now having to come back to it so I can coexist and flourish with the rest of this worlds inhabitants.
Anarchy does not mean no rules. WE know that there are laws. Real laws. Mans laws are different, they sre just opinions back with the threat of violence for disobeying.
As Jaque fresco said, the issue we are having is a technical issue. Albeit not many of us are technicians in regards to this chain, but we do not need to know code to be able to understand cause and effect.
Having a charter or some sort of legal documentation to "protect" our rights is just childs play. Every individual has to protect their own freedoms and we all have a moral responsibility to help our neighbors when their rights are being stumped on, because if they are getting stomped on, your next.
GOVERNMENT = SANTA CLAUSE
while i generally agree with this
when you're en-coding guardrails into an en-coded system (like blurt or bitcoin or kleros)
the code itself must embody certain principles
ANARCHY = NO KINGS
ANARCHY = DEMOCRACY
ANARCHY = NO PRIESTS NO PROPHETS NO OLIGARCHS
ANARCHY = NO "LEADERS" ONLY "PUBLIC SERVANTS"
ANARCHY = BLOCKCHAIN
ANARCHY = HOLACRACY
ANARCHY = TRANSPARENCY
ANARCHY = PROCRUSTEAN LAW
(1) PROTECT YOURSELF
(2) PROTECT YOUR FAMILY
(3) PROTECT YOUR PROPERTY
Everyone seems to love the idea of Anarchy. We need a new Front end called Anarchy.blog
or anarch.io
https://anarchy.blog/
Who writes the rules ?
"we the people"
Or Rules. Ha ha !
Lovely...
Freedom is a human right, let's promote it. Kudos to Blurt.
No Rules allowed.
what if i call them "rights" ?
You can’t call them Anything apparently. There is no reasonable word that can be used.
perhaps, "my own personal threshold for participation"
Apparently Property is Theft.
You can not have any personal feelings.
Source: https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/pierre-joseph-proudhon-property-is-theft#toc3
Sorry i am a ANCAP and not a ANCOM ,. there is a big difference ,.. like a communist anarchist's is not by far a agorist , or working on strict voluntary base .
The communist "anarchist" does not like the ANCAP ,.. the commie anarchist is looking for a free ride , as that is what he believes to be a good social construct . Free market and trade is not in there book ,..
As a agorist i see the contradiction they carry , like good try mate , but nut quit there yet ,. ill do trades with them and watch it turn in to social dictatorship while staying far away from it .
So no ,.. property is not theft ,.. the way one obtains his property can be theft ,.. like tax or just stealing it form others . ( self upvoting comes very close to this )
Always respect a others property , so don't tax or steal it .
It's all just plain common sense , no need for complicated word salads to delude in to thinking otherwise .
Proudhon was ,.. a fool to me . ;-)
Interesting. I will create a new Blogging g platform called….. Agor.blog or Agorism.blog or Agorist.blog
Stay tuned for more.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agorism
how in the hell is "self-upvoting" "coercive theft" ?
it's also important to remember that pierre joseph proudhon is neither a priest nor a prophet
coercion is theft
Congratulations, your post has been upvoted by @r2cornell, which is the curating account for @R2cornell's Discord Community.