When we look at the top accounts having 101m votes, 5m is a small percentage at about 5 percent. I would assume I could be wrong and the figures could help clear this up, is that the regent vote was much larger. Remember the deadline has not hit yet so the regent will still have a % of its original voting power and still have the votes.
So what you have pointed out very much is what I would still expect to see now before that date.
It is hard to tell if the regent has acted according to how it was coded throughout time without multiple snapshots of the account over time. We can not conclude just because it still has weight at this time that it has not diminished over time and worked as coded.
EDIT: I took a closer look at the wallet of @socialgraph...
We are talking about much much more BP!!!
There are delegations out:
23,017,507.402 BLURT
(-17,413,442.915 BLURT)
Now we are talking about 23 million BP as witness vote...
This definately isn't peanuts anymore!! That is almost ALL MY witness votes altogether!!!
Hi, i think it's like this:
@initblurt votes for witness with 22,058,826.103 BP.
@socialgraph votes for witness with 23,013,822.602 BP.
@blurt.regent votes for wittnes.
@blurt.regent seems to have BP equal to 1 only. I don't know exactly how it is done, but the votes are higher, according to my memory. Through a code this is disguised. rycharde talked about it in a comment a few days ago. He knows and the foundation knows. You can ask Jocob also.
Ok, thank you for the information 🙏
Regent account is something different and it will stop doing it's job automatically on 7/7/2022, read rycharde's post
socialgraph and initblurt accounts controlling witness ranking with 45 M Blurt Power
Ok, I understand... That is a lot of vote power...
When you write "printed blurt", what does that mean? Where do these printed blurts come from? I need to understand...
From Blurt Proposals. It's hidden on Blurt wallet
https://blurtwallet.com/proposals
....off topic , but probably worth noting.
socialgraph was the account that set the account that created
@bullywatch
https://blurt.blog/bullying/@bullywatch/bully-watch-blurt-anti-bullying-policy
The most ridiculous post ever to appear on blurt, imo - and written by people with as much understanding of critical thinking, ethics, and logic, as a retarded rock.
these are the 4 accounts it is following: (only created yesterday)
@ctime
@lucylin
@mariuszkarowski
@mmmmkkkk311
I'll do a post today about the absurdity of both the post - and - by extension , the idiots who wrote the post, later on.
Butt hurt, ego bruised liberals and their 'inclusive' tyranny ! ..lol
the truth is that anyone can create an account, name it the way he wants and follow anyone he wants to follow - even founding father can do it, I think there will be triangle by our usernames, like COAL warnings
is that all?.....So kind of like a an idiot saying 'don't touch that ', to a child...?
'....lets create taboo accounts because people won't be drawn to them at all !'
Time to take the gloves off....I'm nearly ashamed of how gentle I've been with some morons on here (upto now)...
I'm not sure, I found out (rumors) today that they want to freeze both my accounts, and along with the triangle they can block the upvote button
https://blurt.blog/decentralization-day/@mariuszkarowski/d-day-countdown-my-log-hears-things-i-cannot-hear
....the triangle prevents other from uvoting ?....wtf???
We will see what happens... 👍
Some say the right thing to do with long term investing. Is not even look at the price for the next six months. May not be a bad idea with all crypto relatedd investments these days. But I ll keep posting and socializong here, as I like the people and believe in the fundamentals of the platform.
I am staying too of course, but there are a few issues that have to be solved... 🙏👍🍀