One of the idea that intrigued me about your leadership was the idea of there being multiple projects with airdrops. I ask why not do that with this, and continue this project alongside the new one? I know that time is valuable, however this would be a great demonstration that your vision not only works, but rewards those of like mind who commune with your heart and intent.
Seems that is where we are headed.
But I do wish to give you the counter example, I guess as a leader, I've never really had anything but bad experiences with leaders in the graphene ecosystem and seen a ton of infightinng and the like.
So I've got to ask myself:
- Is it worth it personally to be exposed to this kind of filth?
Short answer: No
Long answer: I've no regrets about launching Blurt.
- Should I ask the community to take that risk?
Short Answer: It don't feel right to do so.
Long Answer: Blurt is alive, graphene-blurt. Thing has a pulse! I do eat meat, but I sure don't want to kill it.
Sounds great idea, keep the BLURT graphene based chain, but I'm guessing the new COSMOS chain could be air-dropped in some form.
Excited about the world of Cosmos
Proportional airdrop with different total supply. I'm happy you like this idea.
1% stake == 1% stake
Airdrop requires user action.
New chain will have only one kind of key.