Jake, thank you so much for taking the initiative here. Indeed, we would be delighted to see a more Korean participation in content moderation. We also would like to see the network grow in Korea.

So, that would possibly look like more Korean witnesses, and you know more activity on the social and human side in Korea as well. And, when this terrible terrible covid plague is finally over, I look forward to meeting you guys for a nice kongguksu and soju and kalbi meal. We're going to eat all of those at the same time.

Everyday. For a week.

perhaps we can eat other things as well, but those are my priority eating items.

Also I just wanted to make a general solicitation to Korean participants and say that if you have any ideas on growing Blurt's presence in Korea, all of us are very happy to hear your thoughts, Even if those thoughts end up requiring software development to implement.

if you are a participant in the kakao talk group, then you probably know that you know I have expressed but I'm not real pleased with our current moderation system. And you probably also know that I don't have a better solution right now and that no, I don't think that for example bringing down boats on to blurt would improve the situation in any meaningful way.

It's my belief that downvotes simply create too much psychological baggage for effective community building.

I want also I wanted to make a comment on the coming AI apocalypse. so these AI systems that can write somewhat convincingly are getting more and more sophisticated and they can you know cram out rims of text and far less time than any human could I'm talking 1/100,000,000th the time and I think that actually it would be beneficial for blurt to be a place for the best of this content to flourish. I would like to see high quality content of all types being rewarded on this platform. However, I think there's a very significant threat posed by simple human laziness.

Curating a really high quality content community is a lot of work and for a certain type of investor, you know it's actually let's say economically rational to simply program one's votes. Set it, and forget it, and don't worry about content quality.

I think that this would be a really unfortunate outcome and that is why I am in favor of Ricardo's proposal to create a second paid group of users called wardens, formally, on the chain, who can disable persistently low quality accounts. also, I really do want to throw in yet another appeal for much higher fees. These are still far too low. as more and more of you begin running nodes, you will inevitably experience the impact of chain bloat. Remember, every byte stored on blurt is stored on every single node.

Fees remain much too low.

Furthermore, until an actual durable solution is programmed, I am very very open to any ideas that anyone may have concerning content moderation, including the concept of anarchy. I must admit that the simplicity of that solution appeals to me. I'd like to hear as many opinions on this as possible to be quite honest.