And about the footwear thingy... It was the first time ever sw funds were given.
You may not like the idea but it is kind of a cool idea if it is implemented the way it has been planned.
deleted
And about the footwear thingy... It was the first time ever sw funds were given.
You may not like the idea but it is kind of a cool idea if it is implemented the way it has been planned.
it's not about whether I like the idea or not, every single person I asked on blurt that I know personally didn't like the idea that much either but I mean if money was flowing, then yeah I would say sure throw some cash at things like this but it would be way way down my list. Thats just me personally and actually if 60 percent of blurt that voted on it, thought it was more important than advertising/ further developments etc etc then I would have supported it as I like democracy. I don't want my will to be heard over other peoples either what I like is fairness. What is fair is giving people a chance to vote on and know about what is funded, not just hear about it on the grapevine. What isn't fair is the inner circle just funding their friends and people they knows projects and no one else getting a look in or a say. @outofthematrix is a witness did you get asked about the shoe proposal and vote it in? I am just interested here how many people got a chance to clear this business proposal. Can you answer us that at least and say how many people were involved in choosing the shoe business to support above all other things?
I must be honest... No, I wasn't asked, but I am not the only witness and can only speak for myself!
Funny had a feeling you wouldn’t have been asked.