Just a note, you ask participants to avoid giving more than one answer, but the options are set up to make that very difficult:
- I escaped from hive/steem downvotes
- I learned about blurt on hive or steem
Almost everyone who escaped from hive or steem learned about blurt there, so many who answer 6 will also have to answer 7.
Good idea to collect data over another half year, and see if it's much different than the past half year.
well, not exactly, and that's the point. It gives information on how much blurt itself became attractive to attract users from hive and how much it was simply an escape from being oppressed by downvotes. Here is the important difference
My point remains, you ask participants not to choose 2 options, but make it very likely that they must. It makes no difference to me.
No, they rather need to think about what they choose more. Reason number 6 or reason number 7. If you simply saw that there was something like blurt on hive/steem and wanted to try an independent platform, you choose 7, and if your main reason that made you leave hive was that you were being harassed by downvoters, you choose 6.
In your case, 6 because you probably wouldn't have considered leaving hive and wouldn't have paid so much attention to posts about blurt if you weren't downvoted and the fact that you were downvoted made you pay attention to alternatives and decide to leave hive.