RE: For the record - @practicalthought - @blurt

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

For the record - @practicalthought - @blurt

in blurt •  3 years ago 

Hello. Thank you for taking action against megadaddy. I have a couple of ideas:

I agree with author of this post 100% https://blurt.blog/blurt/@jacobgadikian/no-s
This means that the Blurt Community must judicially take back total control of this blockchain from the hands of a lunatic and manipulator like @megadrive is, he must return 45 M BLURT that were printed by a non-existent foundation, to the community. To DAO.

  • it might be worth for your solicitors to contact steemit.inc and see if they can file a lawsuit together
    https://blurt.blog/blurt/@themarkymark/rduk1c

  • you can organize a public fundraising here on Blurt and maybe other community members will also contribute to the cost. Even if not, I'm not going to let you pay for everything out of your own pocket.

I'm in contact with @mariuszkarowski, he'll also donate for sure

Please publish your addresses of such cryptocurrencies as BITCOIN, ETH, STEEM, HIVE, TRX, LITECOIN, BNB ... - I have all of them and I will be happy to donate

(to be honest, I don't know if it's a good idea to make your crypto address public, but if it was a new address just for that purpose I think it would be OK)


Posted from https://blurtlatam.com

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
Sort Order:  
  ·  3 years ago  ·   (edited)

This is some very silly stuff. He does not control the chain, nor do I.

I think that the most meaningful move that could be taken by any investor or user is to create additional frontend interfaces. The more of these we have, the less control the founding team has and that is by design. That is explicitly my desire.

Megadrive does not control this chain, nor do I.

He does. Even if we get a witness voted in they are removed from discord chats if they disagree with MD. how on Earth is anyone going to create change if they can’t even be heard in the places that control the funds and how they are spent. Right now we have a dictatorship. Did you see anyone get asked anything? Only proposals that get funded are ones MD chooses, the only witnesses allowed in discord are the ones that MD chooses, the only accounts that get threatened to have the wallets frozen are the ones MD chooses and if anyone/ even a voted in witness disagrees they get kicked out. How is anyone supposed to make a change? . I think a new front end is a good idea personally if Jacob can’t come in and kick some sense into the place. All eyes are on Jacob rly right now but it can’t hurt to have new front end options or even forks tbh. Competition isn’t always bad.

Who owns keys to socialgraph and initblurt accounts?

additional frontend interfaces have nothing to do with witness ranking control via socialgraph and initblurt accounts

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

Thank you for the advice, I think that is more of use than taking legal action that would drag on years and be costly for all parties.

You are the sensible one it seems from founding members, and it is nice to see.

  ·  3 years ago  ·   (edited)

Just so you know, part of that, includes a very conscious decision on my part, to watch the chain develop as opposed to attempting to intervene in its development.

I believe that mega drive has done absolutely stellar work on blurt. If I didn't think that, I would say it. Also, I think that a great deal of his work was necessary. I do not think that every choice or statement that he made was correct but that does not matter to me because he always acted in an ethical manner.

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

I beg to differ with "because he always acted in an ethical manner" as when he was threatening to freeze funds and force off a minnow like @lucylin just because he does not like peoples "words" that is not ethical and very destructive, as was his wish to buy a drone and send it to the Ukraine where a civil war has raged (fact) for 8 years now.

His treatment of @double-u, @ctime, @lucylin and @mariuszkarowski has at times been verging on hysterical, which is why if he was my PR spokeman he would be out of a job.
As stated in my article, every time he makes a hate post or speaks about inviting people to leave here the price tanks or plummets.

Is he doing this on purpose? As he must be able to see the correlation between the price drops and his own negative actions.

I disagree with this drone thing tho MD is entitled to want to send in a drone if he wants as long as it’s clear it’s his opinion not blurts. Having said that it’s easy to get the two mixed up which is why on the most part it’s good for founders make it clear their opinion is not the opinion of the platform and seperate their identify vitalik does a decent job of this.

  ·  2 years ago  ·  

It would be better all round if he was seen and not heard, if he only spoke telling people about new and great ideas, not his shitty opinion of who he wants to argue with this week. He should be promoting this place, not policing it, not telling people to leave with larger investments than his as he never bought his.

Here we agree if he is going to post loose canon it needs to be clear at the top it’s opinion not an official statement. If we make these types of posts everyone knows it’s our opinion, as a co founder he doesn’t have that luxury so needs to be more careful or be clear at the top it’s an opinion not a statement

  ·  2 years ago  ·  

Agreed. Do we have a private room now and some sexy time as we agreed for a moment? Got to laugh at it all, or cry, I prefer the former.
Nearly every post I do I am chuckling away while writing them, people read into them venom, or anger, or what ever they want, but as seri arse as some are, I am still having a giggle, as most people it seems are stupid, or taint what ever we write, with their own hang ups, got to laugh at life, as at times it is plain silly, byt fun, if we make it so.

Loading...
  ·  3 years ago  ·  

... because he always acted in an ethical manner.

OMG, we almost all know different!

he'll also donate for sure

for sure

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

I am always wary of people that take funds via fundraising as then I would have to publish results of where the money is going all the time, so I am willing to take the burden of the costs solo.
Thank you kindly for the offer.

The alt front end suggestion by @jacobgadikian sounds like a better plan, maybe between yourself, @mariuszkarowski and myself we could come up with a new front end, even if it is only paying to get one made, I am willing if you two are?

@mariuszkarowski has my email address it is [email protected], if you want we can do 3 way chats on there no problem at all.

Have a superb day ahead.

Hi blurt community, if you begin sending cryptocurrency to random individuals from blurt, please do understand that you are most likely being scammed. These people are discussing positively bizarre legal precepts, and then saying that you can send them cryptocurrency to support said positively bizarre legal precepts. Please do not send cryptocurrency to randos from blurt. Thank you.

  ·  2 years ago  ·  

Nobody I have seen has asked anyone to send anyone any crypto, can you show a link as proof?