We asked many times about the plans if the foundation will step aside. But no one talked about them. While I see that so important. Look at the post of travel pro when he asked double u many questions that needed an answer now. But no answers were given.
RE: Part 2 - The Real Threat of Community Hijacking
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Part 2 - The Real Threat of Community Hijacking
I don't really understand your argument as no one in this thread is saying for them to step aside, I can't comment on that either way this thread is about the foundation being held accountable for what they re spending and being transparent about who is being sent money from the fund. There are lots of other discussions going on but that is this one. This one is about proposals and who is getting paid for what.
Yeah, this all started from that situation. They seem to have time till 7/7 but if they will not lead all this we should have the alternative. But the other side never talked about how they will lead. I wished to see from them their plans. Business plan you can say. Because without a clear plan we can just have a broke blockchain for days or even months. That's worse than anything else.
When I talk to someone I never look at the thread, I follow the discussion.
This was the main failure point in my estimation on those seeking to be the new sheriff in town.