RE: Conversations With Blurt Investor @wil.metcalfe

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Conversations With Blurt Investor @wil.metcalfe

in blurt •  2 years ago 

cvg - Copy (5) - Copy - Copy - Copy - Copy.jpg

@NEW EXPERIENCE NOW MUTED...

Thanks for taking part - YOU DIDN'T DISAPPOINT.

THE REASON FOR THIS POST IS ABOUT DISCUSSIONS CONCERNING PSYCHOLOGY, MID-WITS, AND THE PREDICTABLE ACTIONS OF INDIVIDUALS WITH THIS PATHOLOGY WITH A DIRECTED (AND INTENTIONAL) EXTERNAL STIMULUS.

THIS DISCUSSION IS OFF BLURT.
(it will not be available on the blurt platform.)

Again, I totally agree and think your logic makes perfect sense especially when applied to a "social" blockchain.

And yet you SELF UPVOTE all your own posts and use coconut curation for the same purpose, (and now probably blurt booster) to self upvote.

Could you explain how you reconcile this very obvious contradictory position?
When expediency trumps principles, you may well find a midwit...
@wil.metcalfe - and many others - would love to know..
Another case 'The T-shirt doesn't say how the mouth behaves?'
(It's becoming a bit of a habit, isn't it ?).

oh, you've already self upvoted this post ! ..lol

Furthermore @blurtbooster is about raising up those who deserve it,

How do you define 'those that deserve it' - is sycophancy more deserving than truth, for example ?
(your supervision?..silence).

and votes across the general user base under my supervision with the help of others. We focus on supporting those putting greater effort into social capital and posting quality which drives interaction.

......oh, that will work out really well for the growth of the platform, then...what could possibly go wrong ?...s/

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
Sort Order:  

All these accounts are the same creepy person. I say no to creeps, especially when they beg for my attention. Lol

  ·  2 years ago  ·  

Less than you sucking balls for coins

you are, what are...
aren't you..?

Loading...

WTF is going on here again!
Look at this frustrated POS loserlin... 😂
The dumbest midwit on Blurt!

799mkz.jpg

I think they should bring back charging for accounts actually, makes sense and stops ppl just creating tons of accounts to harass ppl and people just filling up the chain with tons of ghost accounts they only use once or twice and ditch. If ppl actively use more than one that’s fair enough but it’s like dropping litter to create this many simply to stalk and harass ppl who don’t want to talk to you.

We should make it like VIP to join blurt. You need a code from a friend that is already here, or you have to pay like 10 dollars. Leaving it free and willy nilly to BS, repeat stalker accounts, says...blurt is worthless...you can join for nothing Vs blurt is exclusive and valuable.

VIP isn’t a bad idea tho it gives it an edge like you need two referrals or something do you remember it’s a small world? Back in the day that was like that

Well it ads no value to the platform to have ppl just create multiple accounts for free to use once or twice purely to try and annoy people. Some people use multiple accounts well for various topics etc but to just create tons it also encourages farming etc I thought the free account was a good idea to encourage ppl but I see that acruallt Charging a bit for them does put ppl off just creating tons of new accounts that add no extra value.