you can't protect your personal idea of "free to trade"
without restricting the freedom of individual actors
RE: If I Was Still On Hive
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
If I Was Still On Hive
Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
that doesn't equal "monopolies are Victimized"
Yes it does, it seems you are concerned over poor monopolies, stop lying.
i'm interested in the question of when exactly and how exactly you believe a market should be policed
When one group or entity gains over 75% market share in any one sector, by breaking up the monopoly.
ok, so like google owns 80+% of search
how do you fix this ?
microsoft owns 80+% of the OS market
how do you fix this ?
apple controls 100% of the apple app store
how do you fix this ?
Through the courts. RICO laws and Anti-trust. You can put Amazon on there also.
how is that going to stop google fans from using google ?
are you going to mandate a cap on google searches
and force google to redirect request to their competitors ?
What would happen is that Google would be broken up. It would be sold off to a competitor and barred from engaging in various anti competitive schemes.
https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-sues-monopolist-google-violating-antitrust-laws
https://apnews.com/article/google-antitrust-microsoft-doj-6a800b51cc9b6b1c4d1b23bad4510040
i'm interested in the question of when exactly and how exactly you believe a market should be policed