Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
Sort Order:  

curation on YouTube is ok, where a dislike doesn't take away someones income, but merely expresses it is less popular, at the end of the day the person has viewed it so even if they hated it they got some value from it! or even at most where its one to one so if you got more dislikes than likes. But allowing people to be unable to engage in the free market or earning money from those who want to support them, if they don't follow the thought police and the 4 or so richest whales, who like I said all owned their accounts before the site was launched, is absolutely ridiculous for any form of free thought, movement or earning. It does NOT do what it said on the tin can which, was to allow users to earn money from their blogging and take a share of the platform value for their time spent blogging if a handful of people central to the sites development can wipe you off. It is very WEF in the way it works, central monetary system that you can be completely cut off from if you show you are not following along with the thought police. How much more WEF can you get?!

  ·  2 years ago  ·  

Uhhh, its not your income, its rewards yet to be paid out.


Posted from https://blurtlatam.com

💯


Posted from https://blurtlatam.com

  ·  2 years ago  ·   (edited)

curation is genuine, it's not a bunch of ppl downvoting every single post a person does, irrespective of quality, till their rep is -6 just because a person had an original thought, didn't thank them for downvoting their last post and complained, or for doing things like posting on another platform, or taking their own cash out lol when these ppl do the same, your deluded if you think there is any decentralisation whatsoever on hive.

  ·  2 years ago  ·  

Curation is subjective.


Posted from https://blurtlatam.com

💯


Posted from https://blurtlatam.com