Are You A Psychological Child?

Are You A Psychological Child.png

Do You expect Others to pander to Your feelings? That is one sign You are a psychological child. Ones who have grown up mentally grasp that at most, One can hope anOther does pander, but it’s highly unlikely overall. One knows that One is not responsible for how Others choose to feel, and Others are not responsible for how One chooses to feel.

Do You expect Others to pander to Your pronouns? There’s a sign of a psychological child, as well. An adult would just let it pass, or at most, interject Their pronoun in a friendly way and let things continue on.

Do You think that it’s anyOne’s business what kind of sex You prefer? Indeed, a sign of a psychological child. Outside the One(s) You are directly seeking sex from, it really is irrelevant, and a grown One knows this. To announce and parade and all is definitely PLC (psychological child).

Do You expect Others, costumed bullies, to protect You from bullies without costumes? That too is a sign of a psychological child. An adult knows that the first line of defense starts with Self. Costumed bullies are not body guards, after all.

Do You expect a controlmind (“government”) to solve problems? Even a local one? Yep, again. Psychological child. Adults grasp that the best solutions come from Those who care, who are affected by the problems, who are motivated to solve for them. Leaders of the moment will do far better in solving problems than a group set to solve every problem.

Do You trust anyOne to tell You what the truth is? Yep. PLC again. One who has grown mentally grasps that Self education through research, investigation, experiment, inquiry, and prudence will offer more truth than just accepting some talking head’s word for it.

Do You feel You have to ask permission to do things – buy a license, get a permit, etc.? PLC. One who has grown up knows that One is free to do any Ethical thing. Anything that does not break the three Laws of Ethics.

Do You think that the legal system is the highest Law? PLC for sure. There are three Laws only – the three Laws of Ethics – and an adult knows this. Everything in the legal system is an act, bill, code, statute, regulation, ordinance, mandate, rule, and so on. None are Laws. But They call them “laws” to get You to think they’re Laws.

These are the main aspects of a psychological child, but there are surely others, and We can discuss them in comments. What would you add to this list?

So. Where do You fall? Are You a psychological adult, or are You a child?

Given the media promote psychological child mentality, the indoctrination (“school”) system teaches it these days, and so Many are choosing to act like a PLC, I suggest We would best find a solution to the problem.

People choosing to be psychological children is the symptom, so We would best solve for the cause of that symptom. The moneyed psychopaths who control what the media, publishing, and schools offer is the problem to solve for. For it is They who create the simpering children in society. Their money pays for it.

And We have technology – that They hide, of course – that would make Their tool of money nonfunctional. I have been offering the path to bringing it forth for a long while but will persist. I am in no position Myself to do the experiments, being homeless, disabled, elderly, destitute. But if You can do the work, You will earn the fame, the thanks, the glory and other social currencies We account for in Our hearts and minds.

I offer here links to My work, including what I know of one free energy technology and why free energy will make money, the accounting for Our energy added pointless:

Member Society of Ethical Sovereigns 1080p.png

Signature:

Endia – A Short Story by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/260/endia

Quite the Opposite – A Short Story for Change – by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/72/quite-opposite-short-story-change

The Abundance Paradigm – A Novella by Amaterasu Solar
http://tapyoureit.boards.net/thread/242/abundance-paradigm-novella

My father taught Me never to believe anything. He told Me to place probabilities and adjust them as new data come along, asking the question, "Does that explain what I see?," when evaluating data. He was an aerospace engineer, and worked with T Townsend Brown (see My featured vid on Odysee or YouToilet). From a very early age I was concerned that the way I was told things worked, in terms of government and social affairs, did not explain what I saw. So the first few decades I worked to determine WHY this was.

I wound up in banking, seeing the flow of things in the headquarters of a major bank in Los Angeles. I became intimately familiar with the flow of money, and economics. I asked the question, "Why do We use money?"

When the web arrived, My research capabilities flourished, and I learned much that explained what I saw, but the only explanations I found for why We use money started with trade and barter, which are still money in a direct form, and did not answer the WHY. Then, I came upon the explanation that these were used because, with a finite amount of stuff, it was to ensure that We got Our "fair share" in a scarcity environment, in exchange for the work We added.

From this I realized the WHY. We were accounting for Our energy input into things. And that We needed to do this because the Human energy was scarce compared to what We needed to be produced (back then).

I also discovered that over half Our planet's wealth was "owned" by fewer than 100 Humans...

I was very interested in psychology, too. And studied it deeply, being fascinated by psychopathy, focusing on that aberration, learning that They had discovered a gene that manifested Individuals who were incapable of love, compassion, caring, and empathy for Others – primary psychopaths. Seeing that the wealth was so disproportionate, and that the families who "owned" it inbred, what would explain what I saw would be that They wanted to retain that psychopathic gene. Given that the wealth could feed, clothe, house ALL of Us (and give Us freedom) abundantly and many times over, and yet None set forth to care for Humanity, I had to give probability approaching 100% that They are psychopaths, as that explains perfectly what I see, and answers My quest for why the way I was told things worked did not explain what I saw.

And I asked... If I was a psychopath, with enough wealth to buy anything and anyOne I wanted to, and given that money = power (power over Others is something psychopaths seek), would I be motivated to create a false "reality" for the masses and thereby manipulate Them? I think You can figure out what answer I came up with. And would that explain what I see? Absolutely.

Now, given that money is merely the accounting token used to account for Our Human energy, it would follow that free energy would threaten fully the accounting for Our energy. If I was a psychopath, with enough money to buy sites like Wikipedia, the media, the education system, etc., would I do all I could to suppress and hide free energy?

And given I personally know that electrogravitics offers both gravity control and energy from the aether (the electromagnetic field that pervades the universe), and that it went into black projects, such efforts to hide and suppress would explain what I see completely.

So I am neither a "conspiracy theorist," nor am I a "conspiritard," but rather... I am a conspiracy analyst. And given this analysis, knowing that conspiracies are the NORM in history and that they didn't just stop some years back, I conclude that conspiracies abound. That explains perfectly what I see.

Love always.

_{Posted from https://blurtlatam.intinte.org}

Sort Order:

Trending

[-]

amaterasusolar · last year ·

I thought of another: Do You assign "true" and "false" labels to data You encounter? PLC. An adult realizes that We never have ALL the data on anything; there's always the possibility of new data coming along that show that old data were incorrect. An adult assigns probabilities of truth, asking if the data explain what One sees to assess the probabilities. An adult adjusts the probabilities when new data come along that better explain what One sees.