well it seems to me that @nabeel's goal is simply to ensure that the pool on the blurt platform is not drained too much and like every person who deals with pursuing violations is cut for everyone who does it in some way. It would be worth considering whether this support could not simply look more official so that it would be clear who is upvoting whom and for what.

the main problem of social media platforms like blurt is that in reality someone buys all these blurts for real money and no one simply wants to buy something that has empty value behind it. that is why such scandals will unfortunately happen.

I am constantly working on developing structures that are supposed to increase engagement and give usefulness to blurt tokens and also on appreciating the most valuable content without the need for penalties but through engagement and supporting solutions based on positive reinforcement. Unfortunately, it takes time... a lot of time...