ok guys where is the second bottom of this dispute and who really wants what?
If @nabeeel is right it means that someone (in this case @symbionts) simply does not understand that you do not have to create a fake account on blurt to earn on your own rate. It is understandable that if someone maintains a service like @ecosynthetizer they expect support and even @megadrive once mentioned to look for such support like I did in the case of @khrom-proposals.
DAO was blocked so maybe it is about some frustration?
On the other hand, people have different motivations under the guise of creating different structures. The question is what?
In turn, the question is how sure @nabeeel are you that your accusations are justified and how much are they some kind of prejudice?
really, in my opinion, situations like this are completely unnecessary here on blurt. We don't have hive wathers here, nor any downvote cabals, and on their FEs everyone can block whoever they want at their discretion.
To avoid abuse, instead of creating a banning and settlement supervision infrastructure, we should think about how to introduce motivational tools that are resistant to abuse and at the same time give the feeling that scheming simply doesn't pay off, so it won't be worth it for anyone to waste their time and nerves on it.
fcc:
Hello @khrom
To clarify, I am indeed the curator of the Ecosynthesizer account, and I fully acknowledge this role. It’s important to highlight that this mad person initially accused certain accounts of being fake. For you if you are on discord I encourage you to revisit the blurt discord channel Report abuse or appeal.
Initially, his conflict was with @janita2024, who effectively defended herself and resolved the matter, causing him to fall silent for a while. Later, he approached me with claims that, as Pakistanis, we should support each other. Before making these allegations, he should have thought more carefully. When he asked me to support the accounts of blurt-step and afzal-qamar in my community, I firmly declined, which seemed to trigger his sudden wave of accusations that all these accounts belong to me.
I proposed a straightforward solution: verifying these accounts through angelica for transparency. BTW, I am currently inactive on Blurt except for curating posts. And Good thing is I am in blurt booster whitelist It means I can get upvotes from blurt booster. But still i am no longer be active on Blurt.
It’s time for all of you to focus on genuine engagement rather than baseless accusations. Let's move forward with fairness and trust at the forefront.
Best regards,
CC: @khrom
well it seems to me that @nabeel's goal is simply to ensure that the pool on the blurt platform is not drained too much and like every person who deals with pursuing violations is cut for everyone who does it in some way. It would be worth considering whether this support could not simply look more official so that it would be clear who is upvoting whom and for what.
the main problem of social media platforms like blurt is that in reality someone buys all these blurts for real money and no one simply wants to buy something that has empty value behind it. that is why such scandals will unfortunately happen.
I am constantly working on developing structures that are supposed to increase engagement and give usefulness to blurt tokens and also on appreciating the most valuable content without the need for penalties but through engagement and supporting solutions based on positive reinforcement. Unfortunately, it takes time... a lot of time...
Why fabiha protecting and commenting for them.no blocked user comment yet
Hmm maybe they have some kind of arrangement or in this way they want to support this user for some reason?
Over the years on hive and steem I have learned one thing... it honestly doesn't matter much whether a user creates fake accounts or creates farms. More nerves and energy are spent on combating such abuses and this only creates a lot of acid on the platform which translates into an outflow of users to more neutral places or places with a more sophisticated version of combating abuses. sophisticated, i.e. one that does not echo publicly. We are talking about a few dollars here and calculate the time you spend fighting these abuses in money... this is work worth hundreds of dollars. And another question is where does the money in social media come from? Well, it comes from the fact that there are reach, so from the fact that there are many users. Abbusers or not but still some people who might want to spend those blurts on something like blurt games or other products... For me, the priority is to attract as many users as possible and create solutions that will disproportionately support those authors who create something really valuable than those who cheat...
You know, it's like with FB because there are so many millions of users there, posts by scammers, swindlers or plagiarisms and so they get lost in the thicket of content and those who earn money are either promoted for the big money that the platform gets or those who present something that people really like.
In this respect, we should look at it the same way.
Ultimately, a certain amount of blurt is produced per block and the goal of scammers is simply to sell them, which means that people who are really interested can buy them cheaper. In the end, all of these blurts will end up on the market anyway... Btw scammers usually just burn most of prizes by their activity just like this bot what @mariuszkarowski linked here in comment.
So ithink that, our task should be to ensure the depth of the market so that it is always capacious enough that sales do not cause significant declines, i.e. attract investors and create solutions that will make real users, not scammers, see the point in buying blurts.