I find it unfair that just because they have large amounts of BP they have to make these kinds of bad moves, it seems quite similar to "nepotism", I've noticed several accounts have the same pattern, but it seems that those in charge of moderating and managing, being observers or guardians, and even witnesses when they supervise each transaction of the blockchain are not interested in correcting the problem, instead they keep making it bigger because they are benefiting, so why act fair if they are winning in an unclear way? Typical where money is handled, then Blurt is no exception.
RE: Hello Admin Wakeup Please (eco)
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Hello Admin Wakeup Please (eco)
Hello @hilaricita,
Thank you for sharing your perspective. I completely understand where you're coming from, and I want to acknowledge the frustration that comes with seeing power being misused in any community. However, I want to clarify that my actions and intentions as a curator have always been aligned with promoting fairness and transparency within the Ecoer community.
The accounts in question have been reviewed and supported based on their genuine activity and contributions, not due to any form of favoritism or unethical practices. I agree that nepotism and manipulation of the reward pool should not be tolerated, but it is equally important to ensure that accusations are backed by solid evidence before concluding that someone is acting unfairly.
To address your concerns about oversight and moderation, I am committed to working with other trusted community members and moderators, such as @angelica7, to verify accounts and uphold the integrity of our platform. This way, we can collectively make sure that the system benefits genuine content creators without misrepresentation or exploitation.
Your feedback is invaluable, and I appreciate your commitment to maintaining a fair community. If there are specific instances or patterns you'd like me to look into further, please feel free to share, and I’ll be happy to discuss them.
Best regards,
Fabiha
Hello Fabiha, thank you for answering my comment. I think that all those who manage curation accounts, administrators and moderators of the community should reach an agreement, have meetings not only within the same community, but with others without this being the same as taking away autonomy, I do not think that it is the most appropriate and fair to have accusations from one side and the other for not communicating, the best thing is to work in harmony. My mother always says that in a trial both parties should be heard, so now that you have stated your position some things are clear to me and I understand you, continue with your work as you have done because I know that moderating groups is not an easy task, there are always criticisms, envy, things that are not necessary and that do not promote good coexistence in Blurt. I advise you to analyze suspicious activities according to your criteria and then take corrective measures. I know that everyone wants to earn rewards, but being clear from the beginning is the best and healthiest.
I read another post of yours (https://blurt.blog/blurt-1787181/@fabiha/4bbily-clarifying-the-accusations-and-seeking-a-fair-resolution-my-response-to-nabeeel's-accusations) and let me tell you that on Blurt or anywhere else, no one should force anyone to post their own photos or insist on not doing so, and this action should not weigh in on the post's vote. Also, Blurt is not an exchange where they ask for KYC out of obligation.
I encourage you to continue with your work, @fabiha, I will take a look at the community you moderate to read the content that I find interesting.
Greetings.