I wonder how opposed everyone would be to something like a dead-man switch, wherein after x time (a year? 10 years?) an account that has been completely inactive for that entire time will "volunteer" to have their Blurt burned. This is probably a moot point anyway since nobody with those stale wallets agreed to that to begin with, but I am curious to hear you take on it.
RE: In the Depths of the Blurt Blockchain: Active Accounts and BLURT they Hold
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
In the Depths of the Blurt Blockchain: Active Accounts and BLURT they Hold