Quality content … Beauty is in the eye of the Beholder.
RE: In the Depths of the Blurt Blockchain: Active Accounts and BLURT they Hold
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
In the Depths of the Blurt Blockchain: Active Accounts and BLURT they Hold
Indeed, you are correct- beauty is subjective.
There is also a vector of 'beauty' (suggesting there is an underlying, human consensus on some kind of 'objective' beauty)
If you line up the world top photo models, against the overweight beach whales - there would - generally - be a consensus of which group are more beautiful.
Unless you're aiming for the ultra small niche market of those with a fetish for beach whales, you aim to attract the wider vector of millions - who have a group consensus of what is seen as 'beautiful'...
Cryptoholics and coders are 'the niche fetish', market - while feigning an interest in looking at the bevvy of beauties on the photo shoot. The rest of the world watches the models and ignores the fetish market. Whether the fetish market is large enought to sustain an economy, is the question.
(the reasons behind this, is a whole other subject)
The facts and figures - and the dismal evolution of DPoS over this last five years - would suggest not.
It would suggest something else entirely...That DPoS social media, is ugly.
Quality content is not just a question of beauty, which is indeed subjective (although it's also strongly influenced by the environment in which you grew up), but also of its form as well as the engagement it generates. Relevance, depth of content, information it provides, and originality are also part of quality.
Quality content is generally content you remember more than 15 minutes after seeing it hahaha
Yeah. I think Blurtbooster does a very good job of curation.