RE: We're integrating Blurt with Peerhub

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

We're integrating Blurt with Peerhub

in blurt-101010 •  last month 

I think economy should be balanced. It should not multiply coins by doing nothing. It can be even a token inside blurt blockchain. Something similar what hive engine is doing.

Of course there is a lot of people who seeds without benefits, but I see similar way like BTT works. If there is enouth free throuput noone pays, if there is one seed and wants money for transfer than you can pay blurts. I'm not new in p2p and with videos is tge same problem like with torrents, old and unpopular often disappears because of limited access. Also you can think about rectangle of interest. Consumer, host, creator and advertiser. PeerTube will be never real YT killer because of missing the last one. People publish on YT to earn money and on PT for fun, so there will be always more content on YT. If you can create this rectangle on PT + Blurt it might be something huge. For sure it's longer discussion but I have a few ideas if you will be interested

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
Sort Order:  

Get paid for watching videos is a great marketing slogan

@agorise What you think:
Seeder-bot will leave a comment under each new video with similar content: Get paid for watching. Winners: see beneficiaries of this comment

The first nine people who watched entire video (or uploaded the most KB within the first hour) will receive rewards from the comment (10% each) through the beneficiary system, remaining 10% will go to server owner

  ·  last month  ·  

theta tried this and they ended up making it a closed system so the credits you earn can't be cashed out, only "verified creators" could convert to cash

  ·  last month  ·  

sounds familiar


🥓

  ·  last month  ·  

I think trying to monetize every little thing just to get people to use a product is kinda slimy. It's like we're desperate or something. That's just my personal opinion of course.

Look at twitter for example. People don't earn anything over there to post content, comment, reply, retweet videos and so on. Twitter became popular thru initial marketing and freedom of speech. It grew due to people sharing links to their favorite content. None of those millions of users have earned 1 cent for doing that for twitter.

Over the years, I have focused our products on UX, and making them as discoverable, and accessible to as many people across a multitude of networks as possible (content syndication). That "reach" is what platforms like Youtube will never offer. They want you in their walled garden, and get the people to freely enslave themselves to it.

okay, at the moment there is no point in discussing such ideas, we will see after a year how it all works. If the project does not finance itself then we can return to this or other ideas. The worst idea would be funding from the Blurt DAO, as it would only worsen the already bad financial situation of this blockchain. DAO might be good for those blockchains that don't have a shared reward pool, but reward pool + DAO is way too inflationary

  ·  last month  ·  

I've never said that we should pay for watching or use standard reward pool. Nova days 4K is very popular and 8K might be soon. It means that a lot of data should be on storage even if each person will use 20GB on own drive to upload there will be not much videos. I would like to reward that with ex. additional token on in blurt blockchain. Also you have to use quite a lot of bandwidth to support p2p network. Impossible with ex. mobile devices. So I see that more less the same like old torrent trackers worked. Each person has calculated ratio in/out. If difference is too big you can buy additional transfer on blurt. So some people will be receiving token because of positive ratio, same will need to buy because of negative. Of course it's peertube and it's decentralized so there will be blurt users and outside of our community. So it will be still possble to watch video but probably you will have less seeders. That is more less what I'm proposing. Still we should think what kind of data should go to blockchain and what kind of format. Pools, queries, offers? probably not important now to show the idea.

Also I think contents creators should have % because without them seeders will be not able to earn.

at the moment the most important thing is to start the project

  ·  last month  ·  

Sure. That can be great begining of big project

  ·  last month  ·  

i think this would work better if the person who posts the video can donate an adjustable amount of blurt, to be distributed to viewers as incentive

that way it doesn't interfere with the "reward-pool"

  ·  last month  ·  

Paying people to watch your video? That's almost as bad imo as asking viewers all the time to “Please Like, Comment, Subscribe, Share, and Click the bell icon”.

If the Creator is posting content of value, he/she will earn more. Paying people to watch you just seems like a cry for help to me.

  ·  last month  ·  

yeah, well, "get paid to watch" was the slogan on theta

and people pay to promote vids all the time

might as well make it transparent

i'd certainly be willing to set a bounty for my own vids

paying viewers makes more sense than paying the platform to promote vids

it's pretty tough to cultivate an audience from scratch

especially if you're not commenting on "the current thing"

or something from "pop-culture"

  ·  last month  ·  

Ideas can make the world a better place 100% :)

  ·  last month  ·  

You can find me on Discord when you will be ready ;)

  ·  last month  ·  

Thanx :) I can't stand discord though, I prefer to use distributed tech.
Also, it benefits the community as a whole if we hash out our ideas here in public.

  ·  last month  ·  

How bout we first start replacing things Like DISCORD, with BLURT... Id rather be burning Blurt with private or public conversations and use it as the resource to pay for Data...

Elements is a Great way to combine BLURT and IDs to setup P2P comms... others are doing it. 🥓

  ·  last month  ·  

The Matrix federated protocol (ref: Element app) offers many bridges and widgets already. We could make a bridge for Blurt with matrix, activitypub, and quite a few protocols in fact. The tech is already here, we just have to start using it 😊

  ·  last month  ·  

I always wanted to see Witnesses bringing these things forward in an OPEN Fashion rather than a bunch of servers hidden in closets keeping a few anon nerds rich beyond belief like on hive ... PIVIX up in Canada for example runs a majority of the hive witness list and none of those Douschebags have any actual Internet Tech experience ... except for a few JackAsses who built their own WIX sites.


BLURT is not a BLOG... its a WEB3 Tech that NO ONE is using Properly! Instead, everyone wants the Race to be Over and them declared winners to be Paid! Everyone wants just Free Made Up Money because THAT is what they were told. But MONEY is the very thing this Tech is Destroying! This should be about Identity and how not to get eaten by the Web in all of its Grotesque Glory! It shouldn't be about getting Paid at All!