My opinion, No concrete proof of @fabiha being a scammer.

in witness •  2 months ago  (edited)

But because of feelings!

Nabeel insists she is abusing blurt pools resources.

I looked over everything available to me and haven't found something beyond doubt to even remotely fit the title of scammer.

So why is there still this:

Screenshot_2024-11-05-05-37-25-964_com.brave.browser-edit.jpg

You're more than welcome to look into the matter yourself but here is the jist of it.

Nabeel is accusing fabiha of using fake accounts to get votes on the ecosyntheziser community.

For the most part I found its just an accusation.

So this the burden of proof lies on Nabeel and the only evidence he has presented publicly is this post

And fabiha has given her side and denies it.

I want more eyes on this so this small dispute can be settled.

I'm going to be going over everything once again, but hopefully some more information gets presented from both sides and from the public that will settle this once and for all on this particular case.

@Nabeel vs @fabiha

I ask for this:

  • refrain from speaking Ill about each other
    *Stick to the facts available.
  • Separate your own personal opinion from the evidence.
  • Let the blurt public investigate this.
  • Burden of proof lies on the claimant. So @nabeel if you have anything else to show, do so on your own post or comment below. take your time to gather your things, your thoughts, etc and present them here if you will.

To the public: This will take sometime but your help is appreciated.

Also, if you want to label an abuser I got one for you. A comment and post farmer self voting for rewards.

https://blurt.intinte.org/@pingyuan

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
Sort Order:  
  ·  2 months ago  ·  

It's just like hive


Where "They" look out for "Our" best interest 🥓

  ·  2 months ago  ·   (edited)

A certain atypical behavior can be observed among the above mentioned accounts. Votes that do not seem to be random. But beyond that suspicion for the moment there is nothing to indicate a farming or closed voting circle, perhaps the applicant should be more organized and verify:

  • that it is not plagiarized content
  • the route used to withdraw funds
  • the voting circle between these accounts and the eco account

Additionally, if the owner of the eco account is not interested in what they do with their votes or delegations, we can do nothing about it beyond just alerting.

Note: there is no written rule stating that you cannot vote for yourself, however ideally the 20 votes that can be awarded per day should be directed to other users. This is more a matter of ethics and morals, than something forbidden.