I have pointed out to randula, that I will NOT be doing this! I do not want to be a part of the secret games being played here... I have always been straight forward and THAT I am truly missing here!
RE: Whilst whale account @initblurt powers down 166K Blurt, I powerup 9K !!! Don't be like @initblurt!!! Power up!!! 🔋
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Whilst whale account @initblurt powers down 166K Blurt, I powerup 9K !!! Don't be like @initblurt!!! Power up!!! 🔋
You are just making this a mess, witness need to help the blockchain and keep it running, discussing with other decisions. But you are doing it another way. This is now what a witness is about.
But if you feel this is right, keep doing that.
I have no idea, what you are talking about?
I have had contact, more or less, with each and every one of the top 20 witnesses here on the chain... EXCEPT @apokruphos, so it is my perfect right to ask questions!
You have a problem with me asking here and not on Discord?
Well, that is your problem, not mine...
Well that's the issue itself, you are just doing this because you want to be in just his place. You don't actually care for blurt, just for power.
I hope and pray for your success.
So just because he is asking publicly for anyone to know who a witness is, this means @outofthematrix doesn't care for Blurt? Really man?
That is exactly the reason, why nobody likes the guy... Always the same behavioural pattern. If you don't consent to the way they are running this place, he just frames you as a Blurt hater. The technique he is using for this, probably unconsciously, is called 'Gaslighting'.
I guess you're already classified, watch out for some head bumps coming your way in the future...
Bring em on... 😜
His asking the question is not an issue, but the way he asks and the place. There is a discord group of witnesses where he could have asked and gotten the answer.
Because on Blockchain most people stay anonymous.
So we, the rest of the people should not have the right to know who one of our leading witnesses is, right? That is exactly what I'm understanding from your statement. @outofthematrix is a witness and he could have asked the question on Discord, but I'm not so I can't.
Yes, one should only vote a witness if he likes. If you think, you don't know his identity, and that matters just don't vote him.
But this does not mean, one can say there is something strange going on, or phishy.
This is all because of Upvu and Steem, when all witnesses decided to turn off nodes here because of steem.
But they haven't left blurt, they back with secret identities.
And if you or someone else think, it is worth loosing a witness again just because we want to know his identity . Is it fine ?
I myself don't have any issues. Also you can directly ask him, tag him or write a memo, but atleast do in a better way than just putting allegations.
That is the funniest thing I have read in a long time! 😂 You're always good for a laugh buddy! 😉
That proves to that you neither know me nor do you know what I stand for... Or where I came from...
But I seemed to have dug up something, when I see your reaction...
Keep laughing, you surely dug something, that we all know now...