RE: Fact Check: Does the WEF have the stated Goal that You will own nothing and be Happy ?

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Fact Check: Does the WEF have the stated Goal that You will own nothing and be Happy ?

in wef •  3 years ago  (edited)

Wrong …

This idealogy is from the Communist Manifesto brother.

The theory of Communism may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property.

— Karl Marx, 1818-1883, German philosopher

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
Sort Order:  
  ·  3 years ago  ·  

I know it is, and that is the WEF statement on their page not my page, "we need capitalism with a pinch of communism" Get it yet? You really do need to do some research not just spout nonsensical things. These are there adverts, NOT MINE.

You have shocked me with your total lack of research, you must be a very busy man, so am I, but at least put more effort in than "this is from the communist manifesto" we all know that, but that IS THE WEF AIM.

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

This video is pretty tame compared to the original one they had on their website. The original video was even more transparent with what their goals are. This one here just talks about renting and they try to hide their agenda somewhat in order to make it more palatable for the average normie.

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

Hence why download and save everything - before it disappears. At least one can check it isn't a false memory!

this scamdemic has changed so many definitions that any naive person checking a website just won't know of the changes. eg a gene-jab that isn't a vax suddenly becomes a vax.

The "nobody left behind" meme used in economics makes me bristle, as has been used for decades in education and basically means "nobody allowed to progress". Obedience becomes far more important than intelligence and imagination.

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

It is the genuine lack of any critical thinking that gets me, I have no idea how they managed this, but they did.

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

Some years ago I dug up some old exam papers from the net, from the 1980s, just to check if it was my faulty memory, or whether exams are now much easier.

the real difference is, as you said, the lack of critical thinking during the test. The syllabus in my own subject, maths and physics, has not changed hugely, but two things have happened. The syllabus has been granulated to the point of being a bag of factoids, so the kids have to learn and memorise lots of stuff, BUT the questions do not deviate from the micro-managed syllabus. In the past, questions would ask some basic knowledge and then try to apply it to some new given situation. That doesn't really happen anymore, and in those subjects where it does, the questions are really very basic or the answers are expected to be so relative as to be difficult to get anything wrong.

Not everyone goes through lots of school exams, but it means that being critical is not taught at all! I taught Thinking Skills for a year and every student complained it was the hardest thing they'd ever done - to the detriment of the school, they then decided it was to be an optional class... so guess what happened...

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

I can guess the rest.

My nephew the first week he left school came to work for me, I put him on the most simple of jobs, visual inspection of automotive parts, the good parts had to have a green label with OK to use, and he had to write visually inspected, by the time he asked me how to spell visually for the millionth time I had no choice but to let him go, tough love.

So I asked my oldest sister who is a supposed teacher and even headmistress for a while, till she had a mental breakdown, (the stress was tooooo much) why children are leaving school and not being able to spell, she said it is NOT on the curriculum and you can not mark children down for BAAADDD SPEELINGGG.

My mother said that started during the late 60's so how come I can speeeeeellll?

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

That's fuckin insane, right!? Creative linguistics.
I corrected my kid every time - and we did spelling tests - and (this has also vanished) dictation!! I was told that was a now useless skill - except it teaches kids grammar and style and spelling, all on the sly and together. ;-) teachers are so fuckin smart, eh!? And my kid enjoys dictation - weirdly, coz it looks like her work - is her hand doing the writing, so she can see what it's like to write properly. All "useless skills" no doubt.

Like when I teach my kid maths - here it is - one page - maybe 5 concepts - that's a whole 30-page chapter!! "But that's so easy!" she says. "Yes, it is!" I smile.
We ended up doing bits of A-level work just coz if you follow a train of thought you end up going outside the little syllabus box. But so what? That's fun!

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

The thing about being clueless about spelling is that it goes hand in hand with being inarticulate (I do know a few exceptions of very smart dyslexics) - these are not typos, they are just manifested ignorance.
My kid has now got into the etymology of words, something not obvious here as latin and greek are as popular as Sanskrit.
so we start: dystopia - disturbing - disorganised - disappointed - discord - disease etc etc lmao

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

The box is a prison, in engineering there simply is no box - only something better if you think outside that prison, if there was not, we would all still drive a model T Ford.
And motorbikes would still look like a glorified cycle.

Penny farthing anyone or mountain bike.

The problem with "modern schooling" is you cannot challenge what you are told, I did at school and got detention for it every time I did it.
My RE teacher in particular detested me for giving alternative notions/ideas with regards to the bible and the "stories" in it.

I got detention when he stated the feeding of the 5000 text, I said when alleged Jesus was willing to share his food, his alleged followers felt guilty and shared theirs, bam there you go, 1 week in detention.

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

Yeah, I don't recall that either. maybe the virus started in secondary modern schools and then spread as they invaded grammar schools. Also, one could be lucky - I recall some good teachers who just stayed and tolerated the "new regime" and left as soon as they could. I am less than impressed with the current cohort of "new teachers" - most don't seem to know anything about their subjects coz they just have a lame BEd. If I was a head, I'd never employ anyone without some degree related to their subject.

I was merciless to one teacher for not knowing that the answers "at the back of the book" were wrong! One of the answers was mathematically impossible! Should have rattled some neurons, assuming he knew the subject. Then he tells he's been teaching maths for six years - I was speechless.

Lots of tales of the disasters of "modern" education, eh!

I think this is the original video.

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

Yeah, but this video was based on a "thought piece" that is now being kinda retracted. The "I didn't really mean it" gambit of the psychopathocrats.
A bit like simulating the scamdemic and then having to add a disclaimer whereby any similarities are purely accidental.

Haha! the words nail and head spring to mind - I like your style. :) Stake holder capitalism and communism = communitarianism.

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

hence I like that Lobaczewski uses "new" words such as ponerology and pathocracy - to get away from all the confusion of political -isms, that with a pathological mindset all become forms of tyranny.

Mussolini famously defined fascism as corporatism - that should suffice in pointing out how similar these labels all are - in the wrong hands.

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

You will eat less meat but occasionally we shall give you a treat, suck my balls Klaus.

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

The problem is they deleted the original so I can not use it as source material, unfortunately. I am glad most people are paying attention, we just need to educate the rest, with facts not opinion.

  ·  3 years ago  ·   (edited)

I am more in shock that people don’t realize that this idea that “you will own nothing and be happy “ is from the Russian Communist Manifesto. And not the WEF.

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

You keep saying this, but strikes me you're the one in shock for discovering what everybody knows.

Try this for a thought experiment: the idea comes from both the commie manifesto and the WEF. You see! Ideas can overlap! It is not an either/or choice.

You got triggered! That was the media aim - it worked. Which previous war got you frothing at the mouth? any? What about your gov's war on its own people? not triggered? Contemplate on the trigger-mechanism and not the 2-minutes-of-hate with Goldstein = Putin. Did we forget about China? or konvid? I could go on.

Have you never seen the elitescum remove messages? delete shit and claim it never existed. You ever seen that? You ever seen paid fact-chuckers claim such shit never existed coz, well, you can't see it anymore?

None of which answers your question because it is the wrong question. As others have said, read the whole literature, understand how the lies are spread, how it is all in Newspeak to make it sound like a safe mattress - with the bed of nails hiding underneath it.

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

It just shocks me that so many people believe this is a new concept when in fact it is a very old one…

That’s all.

F116F832-0F70-43C2-8452-5546BCFC3DEE.jpeg

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

Everyone knows that, but it is the WEF pushing it forward, like I said, they know nothing knew.

  ·  3 years ago  ·   (edited)

That looks like a really bad commercial for the now bankrupt Ruckify …. What a joke.

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

Indeed.