RE: Well, maybe there's a God above?

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

Well, maybe there's a God above?

in soul •  2 years ago 

I often wonder what percentage of blurt users are unvaccinated ? I often think it’s preeching to the converted here haha I swear 90 percent of us didn’t have them.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
Sort Order:  

I don't know what the percentage is, but I know it would be higher if megadrive didn't shadow ban real information from trending. Yesterday I checked these new interfaces Blurt, beblurt and the other app (mobile). Same crap on trending, stolen images of Pakistani flowers. #lucylinwasright, censorship will kill this blockchain.


Posted from https://blurtlatam.intinte.org

  ·  2 years ago  ·  

we need to create our own sensible frontend with a sensible short address and main domain, not a subdomain for another domain like now. for example, when I got involved in the promotion of blurt, it's hard for me to promote our free frontend because no one will even remember such a domain (I sometimes make a mistake when I enter it on devices where I don't have a remembered page.)
However, of course, you have to pay for such a domain somehow. for the com domain, it will cost PLN 60 in the first year and then, around PLN 500 per year. Oh and @fervi has to agree to rewrite his frontend.

plus own branding

That would be a big step. Unstoppable, unfortunately, censorship, but we can bite other frontends thanks to branding with strong slogans and promotion to the point that they will see that such tactics do not pay off because people are fed up with censorship everywhere.

In turn, as long as we make sure that censorship from the blockchain level is not possible, you can not care who creates something on other frontends.


Posted from https://blurtlatam.intinte.org

Z tymi cenami coś się nie zgadza. To nie możliwe by renewal kosztował 9 X więcej niż opłata za pierwszy rok. Na domains.com można kupić domenę za $10-20 a renewal kosztuje tyle samo co opłata za pierwszy rok

A co myślicie o https://unstoppabledomains.com/?
Np. blurt.crypto lub blurt.blockchain


Posted from https://blurtlatam.intinte.org

  ·  2 years ago  ·  

aa źle popatrzałem. wydało m sie sensowne bo w przypadku polskiej tak masz że 9x drożej w drugim roku. niemniej Za drugi rok .com 158 brutto.

Domena musi być łatwa do zapamiętania i dobrze się kojarzyć to jest pewne.

Może też być kilka domen np

blurt.crypto
blurt.blockchain
blurt.com

i jedna będzie głowna a reszta jako potencjał.

Druga kwestia czy chcemy w ogóle użyć blurt czy np zupełnie innego portalu i np zupełnie innego loga.

tak jak np Peakd zrobił. Można w ten sposób trafić do zupełnie innego segmentu odbiorców i branding nakierować bardziej jeszcze na cechy które nas interesują a to jak sie nazywa coin i blockchain to w sumie nie ma przecież znaczenia.


Posted from https://blurtlatam.intinte.org

zupełnie innego portalu i np zupełnie innego loga

To najlepsza opcja moim zdaniem bo ze słowem Blurt nic sensownego nie wymyślisz

Szukajcie ciekawej domeny i dajcie mi znać, chętnie prześlę donacje na pierwszy rok


Posted from https://blurtlatam.intinte.org

  ·  2 years ago  ·  

Co do domen tego typu jak Unstoppable Domains - można mieć, ale trzeba mieć specjalny dodatek lub przeglądarkę by strony wyświetlały się. Oczywiście można xD

Domeny PL kosztują zwykle koło 100zł, ale to dlatego, że to Polskie :P Domeny .com czy .eu są tańsze od .pl


Posted from https://blurtlatam.intinte.org

trzeba mieć specjalny dodatek lub przeglądarkę

fakt, tylko Brave i Opera, na innych browserach to nie robi


Posted from https://blurtlatam.intinte.org

LL is an idiot for more than we see on blurt imo. He is not a name I want anything to do with.

  ·  2 years ago  ·  

I will fight for @offgridlife to not be banned from front ends managed by MD .
I might not like his ways or content ,. but muting and oppressing anyone is not the right way . The comments section was invented for that , to speak free .

And why did Jerryberry supermute me ? ,.. i never even bothered the dude ?

AL very bad promo's for the whole of blurt .

Get your act together , stop it , your reaction to LL is childish .
What about "RADICAL ACCEPTANCE" ???
Don't become a hypocrite i say !



Posted from https://blurtlatam.intinte.org

  ·  2 years ago  ·   (edited)

Radical acceptance doesn’t mean tolerating someone with his way of living his life and treating those around him . It means allowing them to go off and do whatever they want. I don’t stop him from posting or living his life but I don’t have to sit and suffer people like that freedom for all. I have no reaction to him at all I completely ignore him and let him live his life. If I want to waTch bbc not itv I watch bbc or listen to classical not rock I can. We can all choose our channel. For some reason you seem to want to force people to look at things they don’t want to see. That’s not freedom. It’s not freedom to chain someone to a chair and make them watch something lol.

  ·  2 years ago  ·  

https://blurtlatam.intinte.org/@ultravioletmag/rojg3p

The comments section was invented for that , to speak free .

So all is good there .
But ,.

Radical acceptance doesn’t mean tolerating someone with his way of living his life and treating those around him . It means allowing them to go off and do whatever they want.

So you do not tolerate his way , his life and his behavior ,
but allow him to go of and do what he want's ?

How is that gonna work ? ,. as tolerating and allowing are kind of the same thing .

Might wanna change tolerance to " liking and connecting to "
;-)


Posted from https://blurtlatam.intinte.org

Sure we can change the words. I do not want to connect to people who treat those around them in the way that he does. I do not even enjoy any of the posts, earlier posts I thought were well written but then they just became dull and repetitive on one topic. I don’t want this person in my circle so I don’t watch his channel. It’s as simple as that but I would still stand up now as I did before and argue against freezing his account. If you enjoy the content then it’s your right to read and follow it and if you don’t enjoy my content it’s also ok to stop looking at it. It’s rlt as simple as that. Trying to force someone to read or engage with people they don’t want to is the opposite of acceptance or tolerating various view points and preferences. You can think I am an idiot for removing myself from someone I find distasteful and that’s also ok. Your thoughts are your own.

  ·  2 years ago  ·  

Not a idiot for removing yourself . #lucylinwasright

but I would still stand up now as I did before and argue against freezing his account .

Very good ,.. stand above your personal feelings about him and his actions . I am not telling you to follow or watch ,. but disconnect in a more mature way .
And don't deny a truth over feelings .
As that is at this time the biggest problem in the world .
;-)



Posted from https://blurtlatam.intinte.org

  ·  2 years ago  ·   (edited)

I always have despite completely disliking him as a person and how he is on blurt I still actually fought for him to not be removed / have his wallet frozen. That actually proves above anything else I can put my personal beliefs and feelings aside for what I feel is ‘right’. That imo though does not mean being tagged, interacting or engaging with this person. He can go on being him and I will not have anything to do with him whatsoever and I would really honour people respecting that and not tagging him or bringing him up. There are people offline who want nothing to do with this and so I will not discuss anything out of respect but I would appreciate being completely left out of anything to do with his name please. I will block people who bring this weird tag up In comments to me because I want nothing to do with this or him. Thankyou for understanding.

  ·  2 years ago  ·