▶️ This is something I don't think many people have seen before.
Choose platform to view video (3 minutes):
▶️ Bitchute
▶️ Rumble
▶️ YouTube
▶️ Odysee
(note: This section is added to clarify something. It takes quite a long time to research, create, edit, upload, and manage a video and associated blockchain posts. Even a short video like this takes a few hours at minimum. Unfortunately, certain curation bots are not able to detect the presence of truly original video content, like mine, and therefore it tends to go unrewarded and unseen. Most (like Blurtbooster) only count the number of characters in the post, which sometimes is a good measure of effort and quality, but other times just means the person has spent a few minutes copy-pasting nonsense from the internet, or putting a short paragraph through a translator to generate more characters quickly, or added a long and pointless "signature" on the end of each post. So a lot of total junk gets the big Blurtbooster votes, while proper content that uses the video format gets the leftover crumbs. This discourages the entire video format, which is generally the MOST popular format on any platform - meaning it should be encouraged, instead of discouraged. My solution is to write out this short monologue to voice my displeasure that video is being unfairly treated on the Blurt blockchain. Hopefully it brings awareness to the problem, while also helping me get noticed by the curation bots. I would rather not have to add notes like this, because it's time-consuming, and because my video posts would be better off without them. Let's show love to the video format, too! Thank you very much for your understanding, and have a great day, week, month, year, decade, century, and more if possible. Now I'm just rambling, but that's not my fault, it's a result of this silly policy. Let's get it fixed! Videos take a lot of effort, and add a lot of value. We should encourage and reward them more than we currently do. Thank you, and good night. Or good day. Enjoy the video!
DRutter
Hmmm, my "note" wasn't long enough to convince Blurtbooster that I put effort into creating original content. I'll have to copy and paste it to double that length next time. Sorry about that, viewers, it shouldn't have to be this way.
Are you sure to have 23H minimum with the previous post? Because you're text is long enough to recieve a blurtbooster upvote
Oh 23? Thanks, that explains it.