saving some lives is more valuable than other lives when the value of each life is equal. They say to themselves,

(photo source)

Melinda and I read an article about how millions of children die each year from diseases in poor countries, such as measles, malaria, pneumonia, hepatitis B, and yellow fever. And I've never heard of rotavirus before. The disease kills half a million people each year, compared to zero in the United States. We are sad. In order to prevent such deaths of millions of children, the discovery and delivery of medicines needs to be a priority; But it did not happen. It is very sad to see that saving some lives is more valuable than other lives when the value of each life is equal. They say to themselves, 'It can't be. But if that is the case, then this is the place to be.

Our question then is, how does the world let these children die? The answer is simple and rough. The market does not offer any reward for saving the lives of these children, nor does the government subsidize it. So these children are dying. We have seen many humanitarian catastrophes, all these catastrophes have broken our minds but still we have not done anything. It's not that we don't care, it's just that we don't know what to do. If we only knew how to help, we would be active.

Obstacles to change in the face of extreme complexity. Not to be underestimated.

You need more than luck to succeed in affiliate business. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. But these three steps are blocked by complexity. Despite the advances in the Internet and 24-hour news, the process of seeing the real problem is still complicated. We don't get a chance to read too much about the millions of deaths that can be prevented. The media is busy looking for new ones. Millions of people are dying, it is not new. So it stays in the background, which can be easily ignored. If a distress situation is so complex that we don't know how to help; Then it becomes difficult to see that misery. And so we shift our focus elsewhere.