Thanks for all you do but I think that in the current situation this is not the best idea. Proposal system is broken. It doesn't count votes correctly, and if I withdraw support for one proposal and vote for another, I will lose half the power of my vote.
Anyways, this blockchain is too small for its own DAO. It has few investors only. This leads me to conclude that the proposal system should be abolished.
I ask @megadrive about adding you to the "employee list"
Employee s list is the best option and that would make Khrom the only employee that actually works for his money.
Lets not ask for more anyway , the owners of blurt wont let go of their 200k blurt per month just for being owners.
Tak megadrive z pewnością chciałby jeszce pobierać prowizję z mojego konta :D
Właśnie testuję jak to działa bo zastanawiałem się od dłuższego czasu.
Czyli co jak np mam głos na innym proposals to jak go wycofię to z jakichś powodów stracę pół głosu? Dobrze rozumie? Bo ja oddałem dwa głosy w sensie na twoją propozycję i teraz na swoją i wydaje sie działąć. czy to jest po prosotu podzielone na 2?
Chciałbym to dobrze zrozumieć bo jeśli jest zepsute tak jak mówisz to bedę próbował cisnąć żeby to naprawić.
You negative POS, master of FUD and promotoer of BS. You suck.
Arguing insults and provocations certainly do not improve anything.
I also heard that something is wrong with the proposals system, that's why, among other things, I created this proposal to see what's going on.
Just calling out the guy who promoted and supported the most vile slenderest shit about myself and others week in and week out.....everyone should should know what kind of person this is. Not a good one.
Did i miss something ?? ,. or was it this childish crap ?
I like the double "should should " used ,.
Stuttering from inner anger ,. like all dictators , when angry , as actors in Hollywood movies always do .
You can't decided for others on how to think of or look on to one other .
Well ,.. show us , ? tell your truth , no one is stopping you from that .
Free-Speech still rules , as does freedom to make up our own minds on the information presented as evidence , or not .
;-)
He refferered to myself and another popular attractive blogger here as "snuggle buddies" when we both have significant long term ralationships, mine more publicly.
Is that okay to you?
It had no effect on damaging our relationships....but I sincerely felt that it intended to and was way below the belt, intending to harm both our personal lives on an extreme level, and it s not the first time he s done stuff like that.
Again this is okay to you?
Name callng is one thing, but publicly implying two people are having an affair behind their spous's back is another.
I clearly saw the joke in it , that it was a mocking not to be taken serious .
Witch you obviously did not by getting all but hurt over it .
And lol ,.. i thought he meant you and matrix .
Anyways ,. it shows only your weak ego reacting on it like you do .
So why so but hurt ?
Or are you desperately looking for a stick to hit ?
Dragging it out yourself for weeks ,. playing the poor victim over a simple mocking .
Looks to me you are white knighting for that online snuggle buddy after all .
That the simple mocking done had truth in it after all to .
Then this ,. calling two people snuggle buddies online does not imply they are having a affair that violate's promises they made to others in real life . You and only you took it that way ,. and dragged it on for weeks ,. showing your incompetence and weak ego led by feelings instead of solid thoughts and truth . No where a witness worthy if one would ask me .
But to you baseless name calling by your snuggle bud buddy matrix is perfectly ok with you ?
That i have to take those baseless stupid insults , because you don't see them as harmful to me ?
WHO THE FUCK ARE YOU TO FUCKING JUDGE THAT ?????
A freaking snowflake ,. that is what you made yourself to me .
Good thing is ,. i am laughing and seeing the humor in it shine right true .
;-)
a ok zrobiłem mały research i teraz zatrybiłem w końcu jak to działa.
Ale nie mogę się zgodzić do końca z tym że to za mały blockchain. Jak ma sie rozrastać skoro blokujemy inicjatywę? Rozumiem że palisz obecnie około 50% blurt dao to jest jakieś 180 k blurt czyli jakieś 3000 zł miesięcznie. Gdyby zamiast tego głosować na sensowne projekty to to 50% (bo fundacji i tak nie przebijamy) szło by na rozwój i sprawiło że blockchain zacznie się rozwijać.
Ew można pokombinować z obecna ofertą palenia dao tak aby w ramach tych 50% kontrolować ich podaż.
Co do tego buga z inactive proposals to chyba go już nie ma.
to powinno działać w ten sam sposób jak głosowanie na witnessów
jeżeli zsumujesz wszystkie głosy na mój proposal to powinno być ok 34M, wystarczająco dużo by zablokować wygórowany proposal symbionts, a nie blokuje bo blockchain wyliczy że mój prposal ma tylko 17M czyli mniej od symbionts
Ps. Własnie dodałem 2.7 M z nowego konta, zobaczymy czy teraz zablokuje
The bug is that it does not release the vote on an expired proposal and not when you remove a vote from a proposal (fixed in the last hardfork if I remember correctly) or did I miss something @saboin?