How Much Influence Did Pfizer Have Over Neil Young's Decision to Try to Cancel Joe Rogan on Spotify? Owners of His Music Rights Are Advised By Pfizer!

in politics •  3 years ago 

Yet another example of the extreme centralisation of the wealth and power on Earth has surfaced in the case of Neil Young's 'spat' with Spotify as he attempted to have them censor Joe Rogan and free speech on the COVID19 topic. Turns out Pfizer may have had a direct hand in the decision for Young to say what he has said - how ironic for such a 'rebel'.

image.png

Selling out and being the complete opposite of what you claim to be is nothing new - many of Earth's most prominent characters have, in truth, fit into this category in important ways. Sometimes these things surface after their death but in the case of Neil Young it may well have become apparent already.

Neil Young has been trending on Twitter for days and all over mainstream media for issuing Spotify an ultimatum, telling them to cancel Joe Rogan or he would remove his music from Spotify. One problem, he has sold enough of the control of his music catalogue that he actually doesn't have the final say on whether it gets pulled from a platform or not. Guess who bought into his music!

A UK company called Hipgnosis has acquired 50% of Neil Young’s song catalog for around $150m.

Hipgnosis, in turn, has created a $1B partnership with Blackstone to invest in songs, recorded music, music IP and royalties. So Neil Young has sold his musical catalogue to an investment fund that has already been identified as having a controlling share of almost all major corporations in all industries. See the following awesome documentary that exposes this topic in detail, tracking the ownership of so many of the world's largest corporations back to the same 3 investment funds:

(Unsupported https://3speak.tv/embed?v=ura-soul/jupnbpqv)

Not only is this the case, Blackstone are advised by an ex CEO of Pfizer: Blackstone Announces Appointment of Jeffrey B. Kindler, Former Chairman and CEO of Pfizer, as Senior Advisor.

Does this make it clearer why Neil Young has been thrust into the limelight as he 'chooses' to try to get Spotify to ban Joe Rogan - who has made a point lately of interviewing Doctors and others who refute the safety profile of the Pfizer COVID19 shots?

As usual we have a corporate and oligarch circle jerk, with one corporation scratching the back of another - except in this case they have somehow roped in 'folk heroes' to try to seem like legitimate and 'caring' people. Neil Young is not the only old musician to have tried to pressure Spotify in this way and it is likely that the others are also tied up with this investment fund too.

There are a few possibilities here:

  • Neil Young just happens to hold views that align with Pfizer and the world's largest corporate control systems - to the point where he is happy to lead the charge in trying to cancel one of the only large internet platforms that is giving voice to world experts and Doctors who are critical of Pfizer.

  • Neil Young doesn't really have much say in the situation and is just doing what he's told because he's some kind of sell out.

  • Neil Young is blackmailed in some way and so is basically controlled - as is often the case with the world's wealthiest 'elite' people - See Jeffrey Epstein's child rape network for more info.

Whatever the truth behind the scenes, it must surely be the case the Neil Young's 'rebellious' persona is in tatters at this point, with only his hardcore fans being willing to overlook the reality that he has literally and openly done a deal with the devil. The reach of Blackstone is so pervasive that they have had hands in some of the least ethical projects around.

Those who read my blogs regularly will recall that I previously highlighted that Reuters News Agency, key entity in the process of the reporting of global news and also 'fact checking' is intimately connected to Pfizer: Head of Reuters News Agency (Fact Checkers Extraordinaire) Also On Board of Pfizer - Manufacturer of COVID Shots. What Could Go Wrong?

The dubious financially motivated biases between the world's largest corporations who 'appear' to be separate from each other but that really aren't, was also highlighted when a video was leaked from the Daily Mail in Australia. In it, the editor of the Daily Mail can be seen telling his journalists to effectively lie in order to cover up problems with Pfizer's vaccines: Daily Mail Editor Caught Forcing 'News' to 'Rubbish' Any Science/Info That Exposes Vaccine Injury Or is 'Anti' Vaccination In Any Way.

So next time someone tells you that 'it couldn't possibly be a conspiracy, there'd have to be too many people involved' - remember that, no, all that's needed is a few power pyramids with massive wealth and many compliant, unthinking minions to do their bidding.



Wishing you well,
Ura Soul



Read My User Guide for Hive Here


Hive Alive Banner 2.png
Powerful insights into the Hive blockchain are available at my website, Hive Alive.
Including the only way to track downvotes on Hive - The Untrending report


The NFT Symposium
The NFT Symposium is a community space where NFT creators, artists, traders, enthusiasts & visionaries rub virtual shoulders, share ideas, start projects, grow together & learn.

Get paid to mine your imagination for the benefit of the entire NFT world:

NFTSymposium.io.

Crucial Web, digital marketing agency in Norwich, UK
Looking for ethical Digital Marketing Agency?
@crucialweb can help you to grow and innovate online.
e

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
Sort Order:  
  ·  3 years ago  ·  

Why does anybody ever care about an "appeal to fame" argument - even worse than "appeal to authority".
Crooks to the left of me, wankers to the right...

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

I guess the principle is that if you are famous then it must be because you deserve it and are 'intelligent' in some way. Obviously, this totally ignored the controlled industries that generate 'fame' and also that people make people famous based on their own intelligence level, not the level of the famous person. We face a longstanding epidemic of denial and unconsciousness, masquerading as greatness!

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

Even without any manufacturing industry, let's see:
great singer, does he know anything about science?
famous scientist, but can he sing?
the absurdity is laughable.

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

I hear Einstein played a mean Kazoo :)

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

and Feynman played the bongos ;-)

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

FRESH!

If you ever start interacting here I might start upvoting you again. For now though I'll enjoy your work without voting since you appear to only be using us to copy paste, but save your interactions for Hive where you originally are publishing this.

Not sure if you have even taken much time to read comments made to you, so you may not even see this. But as one who was initially excited to see you here, it was disappointing to see what appears to be a lack of regard for those of us here who are drawn to posts such as yours. This likely will be my last comment to you as well if there is no response.

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

I read all comments here and reply to the ones that are worth replying to - same as Hive. ;)
Blurt has been broken/offline for me today until now - I am also involved in around 10 projects atm.

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

This was beautiful to read ... you are such a special human being 💓💜💓

Thank you for your kind thoughts and words. :)

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

GREAT WORK

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

Screenshot_20220215-115039.png

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

I have a question though ... how can you pee with that suit on ?

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

it's made of a material that dissolves in contact with urine ;)

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

Not practical but FUN 😂

  ·  3 years ago  ·  

more blurt cross-posts pleeze


Posted from https://blurtlatam.com