This is why I corrected My status from debtor (represented by the ALL CAPS name) to creditor (the ALL CAPS name is a TRUST and I am outside that system as a living Being).
I also don't consent to that whole system anyway. If They can prove I am subject, I will happily be subject, but until then, I expect Them to leave Me alone lest I break one or more of the three Laws of Ethics.
The three Laws of Ethics (Natural Law expressed as the three things not to do):
Do not willfully and without fully informed consent hurt or kill the flesh of anOther
Do not willfully and without fully informed consent take or damage anything that does not belong to You alone
Do not willfully defraud anOther (which can only happen without fully informed consent)
I also don't consent to that whole system anyway. If They can prove I am subject, I will happily be subject, but until then, I expect Them to leave Me alone lest I break one or more of the three Laws of Ethics.
Expectations can and will lead to suffering or disappointment. They can't prove they have ownership over us, because it doesn't exist. No one has the legitimate right to rule over another and thus we can equate that to zero. No matter how much we vote on it, or make our zero emotionally big, nor giving irrelevant reasons for their behaviours will ever equate zero plus zero to be anything more it less than nothing itself.
As per my own experience in court system, they do not care if I use all caps or not, nor if I admit to to it or not or kept the burden on them.
In the end it was this,
"Do I have the right to a fair and meaningful hearing here today?"
Answer from the Druid was a definite "NO!"
They sid what they wanted and in my immigration case, refused to let me see the judge despite me having put in demands and motions for discovery on evidence that satisfied the element of jurisdiction. Something that by "LAW" they have the mandatory requirement to stop the entire process until it is proven.
I will not go to court willingly. I will not answer questions. I will say, "I am happy to engage the court if You can prove that I am subject." Given I do not consent, there is no proof that I am subject. They may choose to bully Me, but They have no Ethical right to mess with Me.
And they will respond with "you are subject to law. (Or whatever) How do you pleade?" And simply stating you will not answer will not be enough to "throw the ball back". The goal is to not throw the ball back but let them play their ball game and keep the burden of proof on how the game actually applies to you, on them. Being silent is a shot on your own foot too.
As plato once stated beautifully, "silence gives consent."
And we are not consenting to anything for we have not been informed properly that "0+0=1". Though we won't say such things in that manner but end it in questions always.
There is a free school to teach you that and are well known in the Sovereign realm. Mayhaps you have heard of Marc Stevens?
He has a group on skype with well trained and experienced people who kill it in court its fantastic and easy. 30 dys and you will have the judge running. I have not had the opportunity to try so myself but have seen tons of videos and heard their roleplays.
I'll look into a roleplay vid when I get the chance to give you an idea. And a newbie in court slamming it for his first time. Beautiful stuff.
"That is not proof. When You have proof, I will engage the court. I'll give You 10 minutes to prove I am subject, and then I am leaving."
And I had two run-ins with cops. Neither time did They take My (unlicenced, unregistered) vehicle, just gave "ME" tickets. I never did show up in court. Wrote one instance up - been meaning to write the second up as well.
I sent Their tickets back to Them, saying that I do not consent to the mess, but under duress I corrected My status and am a secured party/creditor, that the ALL CAPS name is a TRUST... The second time They clearly were looking for Me, and along with the tickets, They gave summons to appear. In My letter the second time, I told Them that, as They were summoning a noncorporeal entity (an absurdity) They can consider the noncorporeal entity present (an equal absurdity).
That was over a year ago, and They now leave Me alone.
I wonder how one can do that here. I don't know the channels for México.
Ahh...
Lost not forgotten by dream theater
I will not submit to fit your plan. I am the one in charge of my Sovereign clan. They pave the road with the blood of man. Control us not for we will not under stand.
Wish I could let You know how it's done in Mexico. My friend, who gifted Me His service (He does it for a living), does it for USofA only. Different countries have different routes to Secured Party/Creditor.
This is why I corrected My status from debtor (represented by the ALL CAPS name) to creditor (the ALL CAPS name is a TRUST and I am outside that system as a living Being).
I also don't consent to that whole system anyway. If They can prove I am subject, I will happily be subject, but until then, I expect Them to leave Me alone lest I break one or more of the three Laws of Ethics.
The three Laws of Ethics (Natural Law expressed as the three things not to do):
Do not willfully and without fully informed consent hurt or kill the flesh of anOther
Do not willfully and without fully informed consent take or damage anything that does not belong to You alone
Do not willfully defraud anOther (which can only happen without fully informed consent)
Curated by @ultravioletmag
Humble thanks!
Expectations can and will lead to suffering or disappointment. They can't prove they have ownership over us, because it doesn't exist. No one has the legitimate right to rule over another and thus we can equate that to zero. No matter how much we vote on it, or make our zero emotionally big, nor giving irrelevant reasons for their behaviours will ever equate zero plus zero to be anything more it less than nothing itself.
But they sure like to pretend it does.
As per my own experience in court system, they do not care if I use all caps or not, nor if I admit to to it or not or kept the burden on them.
In the end it was this,
"Do I have the right to a fair and meaningful hearing here today?"
Answer from the Druid was a definite "NO!"
They sid what they wanted and in my immigration case, refused to let me see the judge despite me having put in demands and motions for discovery on evidence that satisfied the element of jurisdiction. Something that by "LAW" they have the mandatory requirement to stop the entire process until it is proven.
I will not go to court willingly. I will not answer questions. I will say, "I am happy to engage the court if You can prove that I am subject." Given I do not consent, there is no proof that I am subject. They may choose to bully Me, but They have no Ethical right to mess with Me.
And they will respond with "you are subject to law. (Or whatever) How do you pleade?" And simply stating you will not answer will not be enough to "throw the ball back". The goal is to not throw the ball back but let them play their ball game and keep the burden of proof on how the game actually applies to you, on them. Being silent is a shot on your own foot too.
As plato once stated beautifully, "silence gives consent."
And we are not consenting to anything for we have not been informed properly that "0+0=1". Though we won't say such things in that manner but end it in questions always.
There is a free school to teach you that and are well known in the Sovereign realm. Mayhaps you have heard of Marc Stevens?
He has a group on skype with well trained and experienced people who kill it in court its fantastic and easy. 30 dys and you will have the judge running. I have not had the opportunity to try so myself but have seen tons of videos and heard their roleplays.
I'll look into a roleplay vid when I get the chance to give you an idea. And a newbie in court slamming it for his first time. Beautiful stuff.
"That is not proof. When You have proof, I will engage the court. I'll give You 10 minutes to prove I am subject, and then I am leaving."
And I had two run-ins with cops. Neither time did They take My (unlicenced, unregistered) vehicle, just gave "ME" tickets. I never did show up in court. Wrote one instance up - been meaning to write the second up as well.
I sent Their tickets back to Them, saying that I do not consent to the mess, but under duress I corrected My status and am a secured party/creditor, that the ALL CAPS name is a TRUST... The second time They clearly were looking for Me, and along with the tickets, They gave summons to appear. In My letter the second time, I told Them that, as They were summoning a noncorporeal entity (an absurdity) They can consider the noncorporeal entity present (an equal absurdity).
That was over a year ago, and They now leave Me alone.
I wonder how one can do that here. I don't know the channels for México.
Ahh...
Lost not forgotten by dream theater
I will not submit to fit your plan. I am the one in charge of my Sovereign clan. They pave the road with the blood of man. Control us not for we will not under stand.
Wish I could let You know how it's done in Mexico. My friend, who gifted Me His service (He does it for a living), does it for USofA only. Different countries have different routes to Secured Party/Creditor.