So if the presenter has a company that is able to adjudicate said concept in disputes in the crypto-scene, through the adjudication system he presents, it will be used if those involved recognise it as useful and fair.
even simply on the face of it
having thousands of individuals comprising a jury
seems obviously more fair
than twelve hand-picked individuals that can be arbitrarily vetoed by the legal team on either side
So far, as I have understood it, it sounds like a very interesting concept. We will see if it gains momentum.
I am always open and interested in alternative methods and ideas. But one must be careful to stay cool about them and not praise them before they have not proved themselves.