Just like the WHO, arrogant and self appointed people now want to ruin the world.

How you can say the World health organization is a world health organization when it is clearly corrupt to the core, is beyond me.
Bill Gates has been the largest briber for years.

But then again he has every reason to pay them off with bribes, his twitter says it all does it not?

"September 2019 What's next for the Bill & Melinda Gates foundation, i'm particularly excited about what the next year could mean for one of our best buys in global health, vaccines."

When I mention this "fact" to people, their eyes roll with that look, you know the one, conspiracy theorist, but I conspired with nobody.

Bill did.

$682,305,429 according to this old article he has bribed the WHO with https://www.spearswms.com/the-12-biggest-bill-gates-donations/

But enough about him already, I would like to talk about a link I was sent yesterday with regards to the end of the UN.

And the sheer arrogance of it.

On the surface of it it sounds like a good idea, ending the UN and implementing this new system that talks a good talk about global peace, but digging deeper shows something far more sinister.

A quote from their site on page 1.

"GLOBAL PEACE AND RESTORATION HAS BEGUN
The Global Peace and Restoration Consortium of Member States has been officially ratified in the Hall of Records effective immediately as the replacement body to assume the authority formerly held under the Charter for the United Nations. When previous international organizations failed to bring about peace on Earth a similar process had to take place. The predecessor to the United Nations was the League of Nations, established in 1919, after World War I, under the Treaty of Versailles. Their primary objective was “to promote international cooperation and to achieve peace and security.” The League of Nations was not able to prevent World War II and was consequently disbanded in April of of 1946.

The United Nations was an international organization founded in 1945 after the Second World War to replace the League of Nations by 51 countries committed to maintaining international peace and security, developing friendly relations among nations and promoting social progress, better living standards and human rights. Since their inception they have grown to include virtually every Country in the World. Their initial objectives were and still are essential to all life on Earth. The U.N. Charter was authorized within the World Hall of Records in 1947."

As always a link to said site = https://gprc.global/2021/11/22/the-end-of-the-un/?fbclid=IwAR3IDF7IcPnDmfjO-BXyljKvqQ0qtXmhYNg7ppmi6hL2pb_BHXg9aIdAbFE

Sounds all well and good does it not?

But then I read every page and got to the last page, that does not sound so appealing to me at all.

"The GPRC operates on a twelve member council model.

Eight of it’s twelve positions are filled by ambassadors elected from among the GPRC member nations.

Three of the council seats are filled by an appointed representative from each of the following departments: The Global Intelligence Agency, the Peoples Government Services Department, and the Key Integrated Monetary System’s Global Banking Office.

The final seat belongs to the Head of State for the Planet.

This model is the same used by Assemblies around the world and is a sustainable, self-protecting model for lawful governance withing a government of people in a sovereign collective."

Yes it really does say withing, what kind of a word is that?

I am unsure if someone just made this page up as a joke.

I mean taking segments of it like this "The final seat belongs to the Head of State for the Planet." And thinking, as you do, who would that self appointed tosser be?

It is arrogant to think people would put up with yet another self appointed tosser that thinks they run the planet.

And then there is this quote "self-protecting model for lawful governance" Self protecting??????

But how about if you have made bad decisions, like the UN has done for 70 years ish? Should you be allowed to self protect then?

One only has to look at the wars in to name but 2 places, Syria and Yemen to see the total failure of the not so united nations as an institution.

But when we think about page 1, and the oh so glossy speak, it does state that the UN had 51 countries committed to maintaining international peace and security.
And now this joker wants 12 with a single unelected leader of the planet?

The spelling of some words is a give away that this page is indeed a fake.

From page 1 a quote "The manufactured COVID Crisis has become a symbol of the true intentions of the Global Hierarchy. The Corporate structure that existed under the umbrella of the United Nations continues to press their dysfunctional agenda while the people that employ them have had enough. Part of the failed plan of the United Nations was to introduce a common virus and sensationalize the tragedy being caused by it’s spread. In their version of peace, they needed to reduce the population to maintain controllable numbers. Their goal was to unite people in a war against a common enemy., which they did actually accomplish. But they didn’t count on the masses waking up and turning against them, rather than looking to them as the savior."

What government body or organization is going to admit to such fraud?

Yes every day I look outside my window and see no pandemic the TV set speaks of, but owning up to it after injecting so many people with mRNA toxins? I think not.

Here is a link to the page I talk about above = https://gprc.global/the-global-peace-restoration-consortium-of-member-states/

That is the page that mentions "The final seat belongs to the Head of State for the Planet."

I must admit other than spelling errors, the entire site is set out well, looks and feels quite professional, almost believable, but to my buddy in the UK Waza, I have to state on record, I think it is fake my friend.

Have a superb day ahead, and try not to stone any polis named ticians on your own, same goes for you shady shepz. :-)