Thank you to the Symbionts team for working with the Blurt Core team to conceptualise and refine Blurt’s technical improvement roadmap. We now invite witnesses, stakeholders and the community to discuss openly any of these proposed changes.
Note that HF 09 and 10 will be the first we will attempt to procure engineering resources to complete. We will only do so if there is a clear meeting of the minds and majority sentiment to proceed, in this spirit I invite @ctime, @mariuszkarowski, @khrom @fervi @double-u @tekraze @worldtravelpro and others to set aside past differences and come together to discuss changes which we all as a collective can mutually agree on for the benefit of the Blurt community.
I kindly request only for cordial and professional discourse in this discussion thread.
Hi Mega,
thanks for the mention. There are no issues going, @ctime, @mariuszkarowski, @khrom @fervi can confirm that, as I made peace with all long back.
Happy to see some progress from the team side.
I always look forward to the growth of the Blurt Blockchain.
Thanks
In my opinion, you need to focus on development. I personally cannot help strongly, because I am not an expert in C++ etc. I would personally like to see you find a consensus and merge the projects (blurtlatam from blurt.blog).
For now, I'm thinking of creating projects from scratch, so that Blurt's team can focus on developing the existing ones, and I can focus on new ones.
Hi,
Unfortunately I am not a C++ dev and Blurtlatam project is already dead, for real. I don't think, they want to bring it back now.
I don't make any promises, but I will continue working only on my Amplifier Frontend currently running at https://blurt.one which is a private and independent frontend built from scratch.
So being alone, I will only work sometimes, mostly on holidays.
I hope you also bring good projects to Blurt and help the growth of Blurt.
Meanwhile, until the end of this year, I will take a break from any Blurt-related development as I have more important things to look over for now.
Thanks
Yep, I don't want to bring back Blurtlatam. I believe to create a Blurt's blog version but without any censorship and maybe in the future new interface.
I support HF9, HF10. I have only one suggestion:
redirect max 50% of DAO funds to witnesses, the rest redirect to @null
If the price of BLURT will fall then we can easily add another 50% to witnesses pool
https://blurtlatam.intinte.org/steem/@justyy/what-is-the-shutdown-price-for-steem ($0.003)
Hi, @ctime,
Considering that there are other things to factor in other than the cost of running a node alone, forcing witnesses to operate their nodes at a near deficit (the shutdown price) could have a disastrous effect on the blockchain. No change is needed to see the witness pay, most probably, fall at some significant rate over time due to inflation, and almost certainly above any likely natural growth rate in network value as we have already seen so far. If we completely remove the incentive for people to run nodes and engage in development, then no one will be left to support the chain.
A better alternative could be to either directly lower the inflation of the Blurt blockchain gradually by tweaking the narrowing window. Or use the potential changes that come with BIP 0021 to allow the witness pay to become a witness parameter or a stake-based decision. With this approach, the decision of how much witnesses should be paid would be based on the collective stake that is naturally reflected on witnesses who are being voted by the community. But for this to happen, it needs to pass the consensus threshold.
We may note that Blurt stated with a big circulating supply, but the inflation was reset and did not continue from where Steem was at the time. This caused a rapid increase in the amount of BLURT in circulation. Tweaking the inflation and dealing with dormant exchanges will alone considerably lower the amount of BLURT in circulation and BLURT that will be printed. These things alone will directly affect and lower the witness pay due to a lower inflation and a lower supply. Dealing with dormant exchange accounts should be prioritized over reducing the inflation to make sure that the fall in rewards is not going to cut too deep in the witness pay and rewards for the community. Then the inflation could be tweaked while considering several aspects of the Blurt blockchain. This, of course, should be discussed further in the near future.
Thank you for sharing your ideas with us,
Thank you for your kind suggestion, I have no issue with that and do believe it is quite sensible to make changes incrementally, from a development perspective I don’t think there is a flow for sending to null by simply changing % flow to each basket, might just be easier to redirect half the DAO funds to witnesses and keep a burn proposal in place for the balance, in which case Blurt Core would put up a backup burn proposal to double ensure burn of rewards.
Please follow @symbionts for the next post in 7 or so days where the community will vote specically on HF 9.
let's do it your way, it's safer than ctime proposal and we will still have DAO system that can be used in emergencies
I have another idea on how to ensure financial stability for witnesses. Every witness from top 20 will receive 25% upvote per day from blurtbooster. Witnesses can publish normal posts or automatic posts like @khrom does. The size of the upvote can be easily changed based on the market price of BLURT. In this way, we can burn a full 10% of BLURT printed for DAO, so my action of burning BLURT should affect BLURT price in a positive way.
I tried to reply you twice while testing the Blurt mobile app but received some errors, will just give you screenshots of what I was going to reply.
I agree with this solution. Under one condition: 10% that is allocated for DAO will be completely blocked (maybe as you wrote some time ago - by return proposal). A calculation would be needed: how much will this 5% give to witnesses and what will be the increase in their earnings.
These days many people think it's best to hold btc and do nothing. It will be hard to find people who want to invest in small blockchains like Blurt, so we need to limit inflation and wait for better times. Personally, I think that after the series of hardforks you have planned, Blurt has a chance to become more attractive to investors, which is why I still buy some BLURT, but not that much as before
I agree with you too, we should be keeping inflation under control. Yes once DAO is fixed Blurt Core is happy to put a backup burn proposal alongside yours and ensure all DAO rewards are burned.
I think I have an idea how much witnesses will get, so they currently get 10% of inflation, adding another 5% would increase earnings by 50%, so if top 20 witnesses earn say 14k BP per month, they will be upgraded to 21k BP pm, which sadly is still only 63 bucks at current price.
I agree bitcoin and Eth will be the biggest winners this bull market, however since BLURT is mostly priced in btc it should also go up a bit.
Blurt can be the gateway to btc for new users because it is way easier and has better feedback loop and group learning opportunity than btc which you can’t really do much with other than trade.
I must thank you, I am enjoying this cordial discourse and idea refinement. I am very pleased we are of the same mind on the future of Blurt.
@megadrive, @ctime
Since Blurt's inflation rate was reset when he was created, we find ourselves with a rate that is far too high, but also much higher than Steem and Hive.
Currently, inflation declines at a rate of 0.01% every 250,000 blocks until it reaches 0.95% in approximately 20.5 years.
I'd be in favor of variable inflation, depending on the activity on the blockchain and framed by a floor and a ceiling to keep control of it, this would enable Blurt to remain attractive in periods of high activity and limit the negative effects in periods of low activity. A floor of 3% and a ceiling of 6% seem to me to be a good idea.
As explained in my last post, we produce 3,456,000 BLURT/month, 10% of which goes to the DAO, i.e. 345,600 BLURT/month, and the same for the witnesses, since they also account for 10% of the BLURT created. So taking 5% of the DAO and giving it to the witnesses amounts to increasing them by 50%. If the distribution between witnesses is not reviewed, then a witness in the top 20 who currently earns 15,000 BLURT/month would earn 22,500 BLURT/month.
Finally, I'd like to remind you that I'm in favor of a return proposal, which has a positive image and the same results, rather than burning. What's more, it keeps opportunities open.
Interesting concept, however, I would leave it for the future. At the moment, let's do what we agreed to, hopefully these changes will be approved by witnesses
Switching to a variable rate based on blockchain activity requires development and probably further analysis to define the right floor and ceiling to put in place as well as the periodicity of rate adjustment and its proportion, so if the idea were to be approved I don't think it could be integrated before at least HF11 or even 12 (depending on the final schedule), so as not to delay the implementation of HF09 and 10.
Your continued attempts to steer and manage conversation are extremely unwelcome. You are not helping.