RE: If I'm the problem then you are an idiot
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
If I'm the problem then you are an idiot
Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
Thank you for choosing blurt @ctime.
From now onwards, You will be receiving @blurtbooster votes on your daily post.
Your post should contain atleast 150 words to receive a vote from @blurtbooster.
@blurtwardens support people who make quality and original contents on blurt.
We are happy to have you added to blurtbooster whitelist.
NO...YOU...DON'T
You support people who:
Do not question 'the authority' of blurt large stakeholders/foundation, who 'go along to get along'....
The so called 'whitelist' - is nothing more than a blacklist for the politically correct to claim plausible deniability - I.e 'trying to be clever'.
Those with an IQ over 90 can see through this very, very clearly - and all it shows is the pettiness, and fragile ego's at play.
(and illustrates how those who think they are 'being a bit clever', are the total opposite - it's fucking embarrassing !).
It's a showcase of the mentality - and childishness - of how blurt operates - and how nepotistic and insular looking it really is.
It acts as a showcase to put off intelligent investors who would wish to support a dynamic, free speech, and open social media, blockchain.
Thank you for the response.
You are a good writer, I do vote some of your post but I do not find it enthusiastic to reply any of your post or comments.
This is because I see you as someone that can easily insult people while trying to communicate an appreciable idea. I also see you as someone who has great positive energy but prefer benefiting from bad energy.
Have you ever wondered what a newbie will think of blurt if your anti-blurt comments where what he first saw on arrival?
Do you know that a lot of people are actively posting on blurt because of blurtbooster, primeradue, mmmk and ctime supportive upvotes?
Yet you call blurtbooster recent form of selecting its beneficiaries political and a blacklist.
If you have questions, you ask rather than creating chaos to gain attention and upvotes.
Although my explanations may not mean anything to you but I need you to understand that blurtbooster was initially voting everything on blurt before adopting its whitelist model to curb abusers and plagiarists.
All I can say to you is this....
It is unwise for anyone to take part in things that go against his values as an individual.
You paint blurt black yet you stay to benefit from the united developmental effort of its team and investors.
If blurt and it's team management where as bad as I have seen you paint them over the last two years, Then you wouldn't still be here posting.
The earlier you start promoting blurt with this your big energy, the better it will be for all of us because a man that lives in a glass house does not throw stones
Blurt is striving for greateness lately, some promoters are currently supporting people with both liquid Blurt and upvotes.
I advice you to stop calling blurtbooster whitelist a blacklist and support the effort of people who are trying to help retain users here.
I may not reply you again unless I see a peaceful and pragmatic comment.
I am not part of blurt team but a volunteer to the blurt warden services and I appreciate doing my work diligently to help blurt growth and curb abusers of the blockchain.
My opinions about you are personal based on how long I have been seeing your post and not incited.
Thank you for understanding.
🍿
I can do that !
https://giphy.com/gifs/budweiserusa-budweiser-charlize-copper-lager-ZgPfiuZB3hUPZxBKIx
(do you have to put gif links in to, to qualify?)
@blurtbooster whitelist apply
Woohooo!