RE: I DESTROYED GPT4 and SOLVED PHILOSOFY

You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

I DESTROYED GPT4 and SOLVED PHILOSOFY

in ethics •  last year 

While I agree there is no such thing as objective morality - in some places it is moral to stone a woman to death for wearing a bikini in public, while other places, not so much - there IS objective Ethics. If You ask ANYONE if it is okay to do any of the following things not to do if it is okay to do them to Them, to a One, They will say, "NO!"

The three Laws of Ethics (Natural Law expressed as the three things not to do):

  1. Do not willfully and without fully informed consent hurt or kill the flesh of anOther

  2. Do not willfully and without fully informed consent take or damage anything that does not belong to You alone

  3. Do not willfully defraud anOther (which can only happen without fully informed consent)

Any who would say "yes" are consenting and leaving the question unanswered.

As for solipsism... Rather pathetic a view, I would say. If all there is is Me, where's the point? All My work is done for Others, because I care, and to think that I created this mess in My single Self... Egads!

Were somehow I to discover solipsism is true, I would just end it all. This hell is not worth living for in that case.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE BLURT!
Sort Order:  
  ·  last year  ·   (edited)

Do not willfully and without fully informed consent hurt or kill the flesh of anOther

unless they are attacking (or making credible threats against) your person or family member or property


Posted from https://blurtlatam.intinte.org

Self defense is Ethicsl, And I have offered a vid on that:

Self Defense and Ethics (3 min): https://odysee.com/@amaterasusolar:8/self-defense-and-ethics:1?lid=eeff9e0c80138ce03e22d76bcd5f2f873ff46b72

  ·  last year  ·  

i just watched this again and it just reminded me how amazing your videos are

always focused, practical, to the point


Posted from https://blurtlatam.intinte.org

🙏

  ·  last year  ·  

it can be a bit tricky to know exactly where the line is between mere suspicion and actionable threat

image.png


Posted from https://blurtlatam.intinte.org

True, but then, that is a problem We will always have.

  ·  last year  ·  

Do not willfully and without fully informed consent take or damage anything that does not belong to You alone

unless that item is either unclaimed or abandoned or non-owned, like a wild animal


Posted from https://blurtlatam.intinte.org

  ·  last year  ·  

Do not willfully defraud anOther (which can only happen without fully informed consent)

unless that person or organization is plotting against you, your family, or your property


Posted from https://blurtlatam.intinte.org

  ·  last year  ·  

Preemption and artifice 🥓

  ·  last year  ·  
  ·  last year  ·  

Then there should be Ethical consequences. "Plotting," though, is not the offence. The behavior We choose is what is of issues. If unEthical follow-through on the plot occurs, making some or all of it happen, then yeah. Ethical consequences.

  ·  last year  ·  

i'm pretty sure that if we hear to people plotting to murder us in our sleep

we should do something about it

sooner rather than later


Posted from https://blurtlatam.intinte.org

True, but that does not mean We kill Them. Ethical, always.

  ·  last year  ·  

dis-arm and de-feet


Posted from https://blurtlatam.intinte.org

  ·  last year  ·  

Were somehow I to discover solipsism is true,

it made perfect sense to me the first time i heard about it

and i'm still here

exploring myself


Posted from https://blurtlatam.intinte.org

It makes no sense to Me and never has. If true, I sure as hell would not be creating the mess I see, and if I am not creating anything but merely subject to it all, fuck it. I want out.

  ·  last year  ·  

well, there you go

those are the only two options

either the "external world" is simply a manifestation of your own subconscious inner conflict

or

you are a leaf on the wind that naively believes it can decide when and where to fall


Posted from https://blurtlatam.intinte.org

What?!? LOL! I don't think either of those is valid. More like a bird that can be blown off course by winds too strong. Most of the time the bird will land where it chooses.

  ·  last year  ·  

i guess the bird is not guided by desires to eat and reproduce and avoid freezing to death

it just does whatever it wants


Posted from https://blurtlatam.intinte.org

  ·  last year  ·  

Not sure I grasp the point.

  ·  last year  ·  

the point here is that it is not impossible to imagine that every person is a facet of your own mind

like characters in your dreams are


Posted from https://blurtlatam.intinte.org